Litigation under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) can be especially costly because it is a highly technical statute covering both credit reporting and employment background checks. FCRA lawsuits are on the rise, largely because it is difficult to successfully dismiss them early-on, and plaintiff’s counsel can receive attorney’s fees from the defense if they are successful. Punitive damages and costs can also be available to litigants in certain circumstances.
Credit reporting and employment background checks touch almost every industry, and many times an FCRA lawsuit is a first for smaller companies. Our clients have included banks, credit card issuers, retailers, mortgage servicers, and debt buyers, among others.
Our attorneys have successfully defended more than 200 FCRA cases, including class actions, across the country. We pride ourselves on knowing the state of the law in every jurisdiction in which we litigate. Representative examples of our FCRA litigation experience include:
- Obtained dismissal on an early dispositive motion in California FCRA matter on claim that a furnisher reported erroneous bankruptcy information in consumer’s credit history.
- Represented a furnisher in a case where the debtor claimed that the client reported the debtor's "charge off" status to credit-reporting agencies in violation of the FCRA. In granting dismissal on an early dispositive motion, the court held that plaintiff failed to allege a proper basis on which to impose FCRA liability.
- Defended mortgage lender in lawsuit alleging lender was a credit reporting agency under the FCRA, based on its business model.
- Prevailed on a summary judgment motion in defense of debt buyer where court found that debt buyer reasonably relied on the electronic records provided to it by the creditor and conducted a reasonable investigation of debtor's dispute based upon the information provided by debtor, and therefore, did not violate the FCRA.
- Obtained early dismissal for a bank on a FCRA claim that lender failed to mark tradeline as “disputed.”
- Won motion for summary judgment on identity theft claim for retailer after court determined that a reasonable investigation had been conducted.
- Won motion for summary judgment for collection agency based on plaintiff’s inability to prove the agency obtained a copy of his credit report for an unauthorized purpose.
- Hinshaw Client Success Named Among "Top Ten Most Influential ARM Cases" of 2020 by Collector MagazineDecember 2, 2020Second consecutive year a Hinshaw case has been selected to the Magazine's Top 10 Most Influential Cases
- David Schultz Analyzes in ARM Compliance Digest: Judge Denies MTD in FCRA Case on Failure to State a ClaimDecember 1, 2020
- December 1, 2020
- November 16, 2020
- David Schultz Analyzes in ARM Compliance Digest: CFPB Stands Behind Collector for Itemizing Debt in LetterNovember 9, 2020
- October 26, 2020