SCOTUS Confirms Enforcement of CMS Emergency Regulation Mandating Workforce COVID-19 Vaccinations
Healthcare Alert | 1 min read
Jan 14, 2022
On January 13, 2021, the United States Supreme Court (the court), in a 5-4 per curiam decision, issued stays on injunctions issued by the Western District of Louisiana and the Eastern District of Missouri against enforcement of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) interim final rule (the Rule) requiring that providers participating in the Medicare and Medicaid programs ensure that their covered staff are vaccinated against COVID-19. The court reasoned that Congress has authorized the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the Secretary), in the interest of the health and safety of patients, to impose conditions on participation in the Medicaid and Medicare programs and receipt of funds for services rendered in the programs. The court held that the Secretary’s finding that the Rule’s vaccine mandate is “necessary to promote and protect patient health and safety” because the COVID-19 vaccination “substantially reduce[s] the likelihood that healthcare workers will contract the virus and transmit it to their patients,” fit well within CMS’ purpose and authorization.
Moreover, the court recognized that CMS already imposes infection control measures on healthcare workers, including requiring hospital personnel to learn about infection control and wear personal protective equipment. Since the states which have traditionally regulated vaccination requirements for healthcare workers have not required COVID-19 vaccination, the court found it appropriate for CMS to take action.
In addressing arguments against the mandate such as natural immunity and a testing alternative, the court explained that it was not the judiciary’s duty to evaluate the nature of the data provided by CMS; rather, the judiciary should only be evaluating the reasonableness of the data provided.
Finding that the CMS acted within its authority in issuing the Rule, the court issued stays on the injunctions against enforcement of the Rule pending the outcome of CMS’ appeals in the Eighth and Fifth Circuits. As a result of the decision, subject providers should continue preparation to comply with the Rule, as CMS will begin enforcement of the Rule on January 27, 2022. Providers should consult with their Hinshaw attorneys in ensuring compliance with the Rule.
Related People
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Webinar
Jul 14, 2026
Scott Seaman Presents on Horizontal vs. Vertical Exhaustion of Insurance

Event
July 13-15, 2026
Hinshaw Proudly Sponsors 2026 Lavender Law Conference and Career Fair

Healthcare Alert
Jul 8, 2026
A New Era of Compliance Standards for California DSOs and MSOs After the Aspen Dental Settlement

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 7, 2026
What Insurers Need to Know About California’s FAIR Plan Assessment Recoupment Guidance

In The News
Jul 6, 2026
Francesco Palanda’s Practical Guide for Mitigating AI-Related Business Interruption Risk

Lawyers' Lawyer Newsletter
Jun 29, 2026
Beyond Malpractice: The Rising Threat of Privacy and Statutory Claims Against Lawyers

In The News
Jun 26, 2026
Brian McGrath Discusses Far-Reaching Impact of a NY Foreclosure Ruling on Mortgage Industry

In The News
Jun 26, 2026
Jason Oliveri Discusses AI Companions in Elder Care and the Risks for LGBTQ+ Residents




