SCOTUS Confirms Enforcement of CMS Emergency Regulation Mandating Workforce COVID-19 Vaccinations
Healthcare Alert | 1 min read
Jan 14, 2022
On January 13, 2021, the United States Supreme Court (the court), in a 5-4 per curiam decision, issued stays on injunctions issued by the Western District of Louisiana and the Eastern District of Missouri against enforcement of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) interim final rule (the Rule) requiring that providers participating in the Medicare and Medicaid programs ensure that their covered staff are vaccinated against COVID-19. The court reasoned that Congress has authorized the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the Secretary), in the interest of the health and safety of patients, to impose conditions on participation in the Medicaid and Medicare programs and receipt of funds for services rendered in the programs. The court held that the Secretary’s finding that the Rule’s vaccine mandate is “necessary to promote and protect patient health and safety” because the COVID-19 vaccination “substantially reduce[s] the likelihood that healthcare workers will contract the virus and transmit it to their patients,” fit well within CMS’ purpose and authorization.
Moreover, the court recognized that CMS already imposes infection control measures on healthcare workers, including requiring hospital personnel to learn about infection control and wear personal protective equipment. Since the states which have traditionally regulated vaccination requirements for healthcare workers have not required COVID-19 vaccination, the court found it appropriate for CMS to take action.
In addressing arguments against the mandate such as natural immunity and a testing alternative, the court explained that it was not the judiciary’s duty to evaluate the nature of the data provided by CMS; rather, the judiciary should only be evaluating the reasonableness of the data provided.
Finding that the CMS acted within its authority in issuing the Rule, the court issued stays on the injunctions against enforcement of the Rule pending the outcome of CMS’ appeals in the Eighth and Fifth Circuits. As a result of the decision, subject providers should continue preparation to comply with the Rule, as CMS will begin enforcement of the Rule on January 27, 2022. Providers should consult with their Hinshaw attorneys in ensuring compliance with the Rule.
Related People
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

In The News
Nov 12, 2026
Spencer Kook Authors Article Providing a Claims Manager’s Guide to Class Action Exposure

In The News
Nov 12, 2026
Mitch Chargo Discusses Cannabis M&A Implications in a Post-Rescheduling Landscape

Webinar
Nov 12, 2026
Michael Adams Presents on Navigating Ethics in the Digital Age

Event
Nov 12, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie Discusses AI and Supply Chain Cybersecurity

Healthcare Alert
Nov 11, 2026
Illinois Enacts 340B Contract Pharmacy Protections: 7 Steps Covered Entities Should Take

In The News
Nov 10, 2026
Brian Turetsky Examines How NYC’s Proposed POWER Act Could Expand Private UDAAP Claims

In The News
Nov 9, 2026
Kate Schnake Examines Unlawful Discrimination vs. Legitimate Advocacy in Jury Selection

Press Release
Nov 6, 2026
Hinshaw Recognized by the LCLD as a 2026 Compass Award Winner and Top Performer

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Nov 5, 2026
FDIC Proposes State Bank Preemption Parity Rule Regarding Host State Laws

Press Release
Nov 5, 2026
Hinshaw Named Among the Nation's Leading Law Firms in Best Law Firms® 2027



