Governor Newsom Issues Executive Order Creating Rebuttable Presumption of Workers' Compensation Compensability for COVID-19 Work-Place Related Illnesses
Insights for Employers Alert | 3 min read
May 8, 2020
On May 6, 2020, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-62-20, which provides that an employee's COVID-19 related illness "shall be presumed to arise out of and in the course of the employment for purposes of awarding workers' compensation benefits" so long as the following criteria applies:
- "The employee tested positive for or was diagnosed with COVID-19 within 14 days after a day that the employee performed labor or services at the employee's place of employment at the employer's direction;"
- "The day referenced in subparagraph (a) on which the employee performed labor or services at the employee's place of employment at the employer's direction was on or after March 19, 2020;"
- "The employee's place of employment referenced in subparagraphs (a) and (b) was not the employee's home or residence;" and
- "Where subparagraph (a) is satisfied through a diagnosis of COVID-19, the diagnosis was done by a physician who holds a physician and surgeon license issued by the California Medical Board and that diagnosis is confirmed by further testing within 30 days of the date of the diagnosis.Significantly, the Order also provides that if liability for a claim of a COVID-19-related claim satisfying the presumption requirements above is "not rejected within 30 days after the date the claim form is filed under Labor Code section 5401, the illness shall be presumed compensable, unless rebutted by evidence only discovered subsequent to the 30-day period." This provision substantially shortens the normal 90 day period set forth under Labor Code section 5402 (which provides, "If liability is not rejected within 90 days after the date the claim form is filed under Section 5401, the injury shall be presumed compensable under this division. The presumption of this subdivision is rebuttable only by evidence discovered subsequent to the 90-day period.").
The Order was issued pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act (the "Emergency Act"), Cal. Gov't Code sections 8550 et seq. Notably, the Emergency Act prescribes the limited powers that the Governor may exercise thereunder. Specifically, Section 8570 of the Government Code provides that the Governor may "in accordance with the State Emergency Plan and programs for the mitigation of the effects of an emergency in this state" take the following actions:
- The Order provides that the presumption can be disputed; but if it is not, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board is bound to find in accordance with that presumption.
- Ascertain the requirements of the state or its political subdivisions for food, clothing, and other necessities of life in the event of an emergency.
- Plan for, procure, and pre-position supplies, medicines, materials, and equipment.
- Use and employ any of the property, services, and resources of the state as necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter.
- Provide for the approval of local emergency plans.
- Provide for mobile support units.
- Provide for use of public airports.
- Institute training programs and public information programs.
- Make surveys of the industries, resources, and facilities, both public and private, within the state, as are necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter.
- Plan for the use of any private facilities, services, and property and, when necessary, and when in fact used, provide for payment for that use under the terms and conditions as may be agreed upon.
- Take all other preparatory steps, including the partial or full mobilization of emergency organizations in advance of an actual emergency; and order those test exercises needed to insure the furnishing of adequately trained and equipped personnel in time of need.
Given the actions described above, a significant question appears to exist as to whether the requirements imposed by the Order actually fall within the Governor's prescribed powers under the Emergency Act. Coupled with the constitutional issues raised by the Order's arguably retrospective changes to statutory and contractual requirements governing the determination of workers' compensation claims, the Order's validity will presumably be the subject of significant analysis in the coming weeks.
The Order is retroactive to March 19, 2020, and extends 60 days from the Order (i.e., July 5, 2020). Further procedural requirements are set forth in the full text of the order.
Featured Insights

Press Release
Aug 13, 2026
Lauren Campisi Recognized as a 2026 BTI Client Service All-Star by BTI Consulting Group

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Aug 13, 2026
How Will Banks Be Impacted by the Proposed Regulation O Amendments?

Press Release
Aug 12, 2026
William Cook Honored With the Distinguished Service Award by the Chicago Bar Association

Webinar
Aug 12, 2026
John Ryan Presents on "Understanding what is Covered Under the TCPA Today"

In The News
Aug 12, 2026
Scott Seaman Analyzes California’s New Pleading Standards for Excess Insurance Policy Claims

Employment Law Observer
Aug 10, 2026
As Leaves Fall, Leave Requests Rise: Are You Compliant With Chicago’s Expanded Rules?

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law



