FRB, FDIC and OCC Issue Proposals Revising Bank Regulatory Capital Requirements and the Risk-Weighted Asset Rules

Corporate / Financial Institutions Alert

July 5, 2012
Corporate / Financial Institutions Alert

On June 7, 2012, the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the Agencies) issued proposed rules ( that would revise bank regulatory capital requirements and the risk-weighted asset rules.  These rules represent the most extensive changes to bank capital requirements in recent memory.

The rules will extend large parts of a regulatory capital regime to all U.S. banks and their holding companies, other than the smallest bank holding companies (generally, those with less than $500 million in consolidated assets).

Comments on the rules are due by September 7, 2012.  The rules are expected to go into effect on January 1, 2013. However, in some situations full compliance with the rules would not be required until January 1, 2019.

This memo briefly highlights some of the more important changes proposed by these two rules. A more detailed discussion may be found here.

The first rule (the Capital Rule) would, among other things:

The second rule (the Risk-Weighted Asset Rule) would expand the number of risk-weighted categories and increase the required capital for certain categories of assets, including higher-risk residential mortgages and higher-risk construction real estate loans.  This rule would, among other things:

The Risk-Weighted Asset Rule will apply to all U.S. banks and savings banks and almost all of their holding companies, although smaller, “noncomplex” banking organizations will not need to comply with some of the rule’s requirements.  The rule would be effective on January 1, 2015.

Important Changes

The Capital Rule

The Capital Rule proposes definitions of common equity Tier 1 capital, additional Tier 1 capital, and total capital.  Under the proposed definitions, noncumulative perpetual preferred stock, which now qualifies as Tier 1 capital, would not qualify as common equity Tier 1 capital, but would qualify as additional Tier 1 capital. Cumulative preferred stock and trust preferred securities would not qualify as Tier 1 capital of any kind but may qualify as Tier 2 capital. Generally, an instrument that allows the accumulation of interest would not be considered Tier 1 capital. The revision may impact outstanding trust preferred securities in that it may permit or require a call or redemption of these securities.

Under the Capital Rule revisions, other hybrid or innovative capital instruments will probably not qualify as common equity Tier 1 capital. Some of these instruments may qualify as additional Tier 1 capital.

Instruments that are accounted for as liabilities under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) would not qualify as additional Tier 1 capital. For an instrument to qualify as additional Tier 1 capital, it must be accounted for as equity under GAAP.

Capital Conservation Buffer. The Capital Rule creates a “capital conservation buffer.”  The buffer would limit an institution’s ability to make “capital distributions” and “discretionary bonus payments” to executive officers unless the organization has sufficient capital over and above its minimum capital requirements. In effect, this provision requires that an institution maintain the following ratios in order to be able to make such payments: common equity Tier 1 – 7 percent; Tier 1 capital – 8.5 percent; and Tier 1 leverage ratio – 10.5 percent. 

Risk-Weighted Asset Rule

1-4 family Residential Mortgages.  Under the Risk-Weighted Asset Rule, residential mortgages 1-4 would be separated into two risk categories based on certain product and underwriting characteristics:

Category 1 residential mortgage exposures would generally include traditional, first-lien, prudently underwritten mortgage loans. Category 2 residential mortgage exposures would generally include junior liens and nontraditional mortgage products.

Category 1 mortgages would be assigned risk weights from 45 to 100 percent, while category 2 mortgages would be assigned risk weights of 50 to 200 percent.

HVCRE.  The rule would assign a 150 percent risk weight to high-volatility commercial real estate loans (HVCRE). An HVCRE is defined as a credit facility that finances or has financed the acquisition, development or construction (ADC) of real property, unless the facility finances:

Past Due Loans.  A 150 percent risk weight would be assigned to loans and other exposures that are 90 days or more past due or on nonaccrual status that are not guaranteed or secured as provided in the rule. This would apply to all loans except for the following:

Unused Commitments.  The risk-weighted percentage for unused commitments would increase from 0 to 20 percent unless the commitment is unconditionally cancelable by the bank.

For further information, please contact Tim Sullivan, Michael D. Morehead or your regular Hinshaw attorney.

This alert has been prepared by Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. It is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship.