The Professional Line - December 2011 Edition
Hinshaw Newsletter | 1 min read
Dec 12, 2011
Download the hardcopy newsletter: The Professional Line - December 2011
Assessing the Liability Risks of Review Engagements
By: Edward F. Donohue, III
Overview
In a review engagement, no external verification of the client’s financial information is normally required. A review engagement is distinguished from an audit engagement in that the accountant provides a “negative opinion.” The accountant verifies only that the financial statement has been prepared in accordance with accepted accounting standards and that no known material changes need to be made. The resulting unaudited financial statement is considered the representation of management. The accountant expresses no affirmative opinion as to whether the underlying financial information has withstood testing pursuant to audit standards.
Recent Court Rulings—Case Summaries & Conclusions
Insurance Agents: “Special Relationship” Between Insurance Agent and Insured Required to State Cause of Action for Failure to Procure Adequate Coverage
“Special Relationship” Between Insurance Agent and Insured Required to State Cause of Action for Failure to Procure Adequate Coverage.
The Court of Appeals of Washington recently held that an insurance agent owes no duty to advise an insured as to adequate coverage. The court further held that in order to state a cause of action against an insurance agent for failure to procure adequate coverage, an insured must establish a “special relationship.”
Architects & Engineers: Texas Court Clarifies Certificate of Merit Requirements in Cases Against Professionals
Texas Court Clarifies Certificate of Merit Requirements in Cases Against Professionals
A Texas appellate court affirmed the denial of an engineer defendant’s motion to dismiss, finding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the plaintiff met the statutory exception for the certificate of merit requirements of Section 150.002.
Download the hardcopy newsletter: The Professional Line - December 2011
This newsletter has been prepared by Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. It is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship.
Related People
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Press Release
Sep 18, 2026
Paris Glazer Named to Chicago Daily Law Bulletin’s 2026 40 Attorneys Under Forty

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 17, 2026
Federal and State Regulators Continue Crackdown on Junk Fees

Press Release
Sep 17, 2026
Defense Verdict Reduces $134 Million Demand to $2 Million in Catastrophic Motorcycle Injury Case

Insights for Insurers Alert
Sep 16, 2026
America 250: The Nation’s Unique Contributions to Insurance Coverage Law and Litigation

In The News
Sep 15, 2026
Lucy Wang Discusses the California Insurance Commissioner’s Role in Protecting Consumers

Press Release
Sep 10, 2026
Hinshaw Attorneys Recognized as 2027 Lexology Index Thought Leaders: USA

In The News
Sep 10, 2026
Nicholas Ajello and Gregory Emry Analyze FAA’s Proposed BVLOS Drone Regulations

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 9, 2026
“Play Now, Arbitrate Later”—“Not So Fast,” Ninth Circuit Says

In The News
Sep 9, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Discusses “Patchwork” of Laws Targeting Personalized Pricing

Employment Law Observer
Sep 8, 2026
Five Workplace Issues Every Employer Should Address Before They Become a Costly Lawsuit

Press Release
Sep 8, 2026
Jim Sandy Appointed Chair of ABA Debt Collection and Bankruptcy Subcommittee


