The Professional Line - December 2011 Edition
Hinshaw Newsletter | 1 min read
Dec 12, 2011
Download the hardcopy newsletter: The Professional Line - December 2011
Assessing the Liability Risks of Review Engagements
By: Edward F. Donohue, III
Overview
In a review engagement, no external verification of the client’s financial information is normally required. A review engagement is distinguished from an audit engagement in that the accountant provides a “negative opinion.” The accountant verifies only that the financial statement has been prepared in accordance with accepted accounting standards and that no known material changes need to be made. The resulting unaudited financial statement is considered the representation of management. The accountant expresses no affirmative opinion as to whether the underlying financial information has withstood testing pursuant to audit standards.
Recent Court Rulings—Case Summaries & Conclusions
Insurance Agents: “Special Relationship” Between Insurance Agent and Insured Required to State Cause of Action for Failure to Procure Adequate Coverage
“Special Relationship” Between Insurance Agent and Insured Required to State Cause of Action for Failure to Procure Adequate Coverage.
The Court of Appeals of Washington recently held that an insurance agent owes no duty to advise an insured as to adequate coverage. The court further held that in order to state a cause of action against an insurance agent for failure to procure adequate coverage, an insured must establish a “special relationship.”
For more information, please contact your regular Hinshaw attorney.
Architects & Engineers: Texas Court Clarifies Certificate of Merit Requirements in Cases Against Professionals
Texas Court Clarifies Certificate of Merit Requirements in Cases Against Professionals
A Texas appellate court affirmed the denial of an engineer defendant’s motion to dismiss, finding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the plaintiff met the statutory exception for the certificate of merit requirements of Section 150.002.
For more information, please contact your regular Hinshaw attorney.
Download the hardcopy newsletter: The Professional Line - December 2011
This newsletter has been prepared by Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. It is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship.
Related People
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Webinar
Apr 29, 2026
When a Cyber Breach Hits: Cybersecurity, Privacy, and Compliance

In The News
Apr 29, 2026
Lauren Campisi Featured in the 20th Anniversary of Louisiana Super Lawyers Magazine

In The News
Apr 28, 2026
Matt Henderson Provides Media Insights as Conflict of Interest Lawsuits Target Law Firms

In The News
Apr 28, 2026
Akeela White Analyzes US House Hearing on Credit Reporting Compliance Reforms

In The News
Apr 24, 2026
Michael Dowell Reviews New PBM Reform Reshaping Pharmacy Reimbursement

Lawyers for the Profession® Alert
Apr 21, 2026
When Does a Client’s Duty to Investigate Begin? Lessons from a Time-Barred Malpractice Case

Press Release
Apr 20, 2026
Tom Kuzmanovic Selected for BizTimes Milwaukee 2026 Notable Leaders in Law

Press Release
Apr 17, 2026
André Sesler Elected to the Board of Trustees of the University of Florida Law Center Association

Hinshaw Alert
Apr 17, 2026
Q&A: How to Submit Your IEEPA Refund Claim as CAPE Portal Launches April 20, 2026




