First Circuit Bankruptcy Panel Affirms "Gavel Rule" as Determinative of When a Bankruptcy Debtor's Right of Redemption Terminates
1 min read
Feb 5, 2020
The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the First Circuit has affirmed an earlier decision that concluded a borrower's right to redeem terminates when the gavel falls at a foreclosure auction, and not when a deed is recorded.
In U.S. Bank N.A. v. Vertullo, the lender foreclosed on and sold a New Hampshire property to a third party buyer at the auction. The lender, however, had not recorded the foreclosure deed when the borrower filed for bankruptcy four months later. The bankruptcy court accepted the borrower's argument that her right to redeem terminated when the foreclosure deed was recorded, ignored an earlier First Circuit decision concluding a borrower's right to cure terminates when the gavel falls at auction irrespective of when the deed is recorded, and denied the lender relief from stay. On appeal, the BAP revisited its earlier decision in TD Bank, N.A. v. LaPointe to affirm the "gavel rule," which dictates that a borrower's right to redeem terminates at the foreclosure auction—not when the deed is recorded.
While Vertullo applies to a request for relief from the bankruptcy automatic stay and New Hampshire foreclosure law, the decision further clarifies when a foreclosure sale becomes "final" and thus terminates a borrower's rights in property notwithstanding any delays in recording a foreclosure deed. The "gavel rule" is well accepted in First Circuit power of sale jurisdictions and in the Third and Sixth Circuits.
It remains to be seen whether Vetrullo will be applied beyond a motion for relief from the automatic stay in bankruptcy courts to cases where borrowers assert rights of redemption in property between when the gavel falls at foreclosure and when the foreclosure deed is recorded.
Topics
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Press Release
Oct 8, 2026
Technology Service Corporation Closes on Acquisition by Blackstone-Backed Purchaser

Employment Law Observer
Oct 8, 2026
“We Didn’t Know” is No Longer an Employer Defense for Religious Accommodation Claims Under Title VII

In The News
Oct 8, 2026
Lucy Wang Analyzes What Insurers Need to Know About Two New California Laws

Lawyers' Lawyer Newsletter
Oct 8, 2026
The Rise of Management Service Organizations: How Lawyers and Lawmakers are Responding

In The News
Oct 7, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses Google’s Coverage Battle Over Social Media Addiction Claims

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Oct 6, 2026
Mixed Messages Ongoing as Courts Disagree Whether Texts Constitute “Calls” Under the TCPA

Press Release
Oct 5, 2026
Mitchel Chargo Selected to the Seventh Edition of the Global Top 200 Cannabis Lawyers Directory

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Oct 2, 2026
Expansive New Commercial Financing Licensing Requirement Signed into Law in California




