Larry Golub Discusses NY High Court Ruling on Builders' Insurance Coverage
In The News | 1 min read
Apr 2, 2018
Larry Golub discussed in Law360 a recent New York Court of Appeals decision that held a construction manager didn't qualify as an additional insured under a contractor's general liability policy. Although the contractor had agreed in a contract with the project financier to acquire additional-insured coverage, the policy endorsement required additional-insured parties to enter into a direct written contract with the insured in order to qualify for coverage. The Court found the endorsement was facially clear and rejected coverage.
While an attorney who represents policyholders lamented the opinion as an "unfortunate decision for the construction industry," Golub said the ruling was "another straightforward policy interpretation exercise," adding: "If an additional insured needs to be on some other company's policy, that additional insured—which is usually a more sophisticated party such as a general contractor—needs to do its due diligence and make sure it is really covered."
Read "Builders' Coverage Doubts Deepened By NY High Court Ruling," on the Law360 website (subscription may be required)
Featured Insights

Webinar
Apr 29, 2026
When a Cyber Breach Hits: Cybersecurity, Privacy, and Compliance

Event
Apr 23, 2026
Driving Ahead: Insights from Industry Leaders Auto Finance Seminar

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Apr 8, 2026
After Arbitration, Does a District Court Have Jurisdiction to Confirm or Vacate an FAA Award?

In The News
Apr 6, 2026
Ian Wagreich Authors a Chapter in the IICLE’s 2026 “Immigration Law” Handbook

Press Release
Apr 2, 2026
Michelle Michaels Selected to Participate in DWLA Business Development Program

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Apr 2, 2026
Governor Hochul Signs Chapter Amendment to the New York FAIR Business Practices Act






