Ohio Passes Landmark Asbestos Bankruptcy Trust Disclosure Law
Hinshaw Alert | 2 min read
Jan 2, 2013
Ohio Governor John R. Kasich recently signed Amended Substitute Ohio House Bill 380, which requires plaintiffs in asbestos litigation to sign a sworn statement identifying all claims they have made against bankruptcy trusts and to produce all related materials in discovery. The law “require[s] claimants in asbestos tort actions to make certain disclosures pertaining to asbestos trust claims that have been submitted to asbestos trust entities for the purpose of compensating the claimant for asbestos exposure.” Ohio is the first state to pass legislation on asbestos bankruptcy trusts.
The new law is aimed to prevent “double dipping” by claimants who could bring claims against asbestos bankruptcy trusts and additionally pursue litigation against nonbankrupt companies. Of the new additions to the Ohio Revised Code, Ohio Rev. Code § 2307.951 outlines definitions used in the subsequent sections. Ohio Rev. Code § 2307.952 requires a claimant in an asbestos tort action to provide all of the parties in the action with a sworn statement by the claimant, identifying all existing asbestos trusts claims made by him or her or on his or her behalf and all trust claims material pertaining to each identified asbestos trust claims within 30 days after the commencement of discovery.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2307.953 states that not less than 75 days prior to trial, a defendant in an asbestos tort action may file a motion with the court to stay the proceedings. This motion must set forth credible evidence of the identities of all asbestos trusts not previously disclosed by the claimant pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code § 2307.952, information that the defendant believes supports the additional asbestos trust claims, and a description of the information sufficient to meet asbestos trust claim requirements of the asbestos trusts. Ohio Rev. Code § 2307.954 requires disclosing both earlier filed noncancer asbestos trust claims and cancer asbestos claims even if the tort action was a cancer asbestos claim.
This law is the first of its kind to protect Ohio companies from fraudulent claims. Other states could follow in Ohio's footsteps and begin to pass legislation to ensure asbestos trusts and toxic tort claims can be used, but not abused, by claimants who are entitled to compensation.
Amended Substitute Ohio House Bill 380
For more information, please contact Craig T. Liljestrand or your regular Hinshaw attorney.
This alert has been prepared by Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. It is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship.
Related People
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Insights for Employers Alert
Jun 9, 2026
A Win for Employers: Federal District Court Finds $100,000 H-1B Visa Petition Fee is Unlawful

Press Release
Jun 9, 2026
Calvin Edwards Honored With 2026 Rising Star Award by the Black Men Lawyers’ Association

Webinar
Jun 9, 2026
John DeLascio Speaks on How Social Inflation is Reshaping Insurance Risk

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jun 8, 2026
Court Distinguishes Between Clickwrap and Browsewrap Arbitration Agreements

Webinar
Jun 8, 2026
Aimee Delaney and Jason Oliveri Speak on Workplace Generative AI Usage

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jun 8, 2026
New York’s Sweeping Motor Vehicle Tort Law Reforms: More Than Meets the Eye

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jun 5, 2026
AI Governance Expectations on the Rise for Insurers Amid New Regulatory Activity

Press Release
Jun 4, 2026
Hinshaw Recognized Nationally in 2026 Chambers USA Directory

In The News
Jun 3, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses Wrongful-Death and Survival Actions Handbook on IICLE Podcast




