Hinshaw's 12 Days of California Labor & Employment Series – Day 8: Additional Exemptions for Worker Classification
In the spirit of the season—and keeping some semblance of normal—we are using our annual "12 days of the holidays" blog series to address new California laws and their impact on California employers. On this eighth day of the holidays, my labor and employment attorney gave to me: eight maids a-milking and AB 2257.
Deemed an emergency statute, AB 2257 went into effect immediately upon the Governor's signature on September 4, 2020. Focusing on worker classification, the bill provides additional exemptions to AB 5, which concerned the classification of independent contractors.
Last year, AB 5 went into effect and codified what is known as the ABC test—a 3-part test used to determine whether a worker is an independent contractor—delineated in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles. 
- the worker is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity, both under the contract for the performance of work and in fact;
- the worker performs work that is outside of the usual course of the hiring entity's business; and
- the worker is engaged in an independently established trade, occupation or business that is of the same nature as the work performed for the hiring entity.
If the hiring entity cannot meet this criteria and there is no applicable exemption, the worker must be considered an employee. If a worker is covered under an exemption, the test adopted in S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations should be used to determine if the worker can be rightfully classified as an independent contractor. Under Borello, the main test involves the right to control.
While AB 5 contained multiple exemptions, 2020 was replete with litigation involving AB 5, as well as requests for an exemption from numerous industries who were negatively impacted by its implementation.
AB 2257 was drafted by the same person as AB 5 who realized that AB 5 negatively impacted "freelance writers, photographers, videographers, journalists, individual musicians, the recording industry, and unions representing musicians and artists." With the enactment of AB 2257, more exemptions were added to remedy this negative impact. These additional exemptions include the following:
- Writers, photographers, videographers, photo editors, and illustrators
- Multiple jobs within the music industry, including recording artists, songwriters, lyricists, composers, and proofers, managers of recording artists, record producers and directors, musical engineers, mixers, and musicians engaged in the creation of sound recordings, vocalists, and independent radio promoters
- Content contributor, advisor, producer, narrator, or cartographer for specified publications
- Licensed landscape architects, specialized performers teaching master classes, registered professional foresters, real estate appraisers and home inspectors, and feedback aggregators
- Translator and copy editors
- Multiple jobs in the insurance and financial services industries, including workers who perform underwriting inspections, premium audits, risk management, or loss control work
- Home inspectors
- Contractor and subcontractor relationships
In addition, AB 2257 expanded and clarified the business-to-business exemption; it also added an exemption for single-engagement within the business-to-business exemption.
There are now more than 100 exemptions between AB 5 and AB 2257. Yet numerous industries have been notably absent from any exemption—namely the trucking industry and the gig economy.
A variety of gig economy businesses sought exemptions through the courts, but were unsuccessful. Proposition 22—the most expensive initiative in California's history—was subsequently added to the ballot in November. It asked voters whether app-based drivers can be classified as independent contractors. It passed by approximately 58%, giving some gig economy businesses the ability to continue classifying certain workers as independent contractors in spite of AB 5.
A business' best practices include evaluating each potential independent contractor relationship carefully. It is also recommended to consult legal counsel to ensure classification accuracy. Can the hiring entity meet the ABC test? Is the worker covered under an exemption? And, if covered under an exemption, does the worker meet the Borello test? Businesses should also continually evaluate their workers to ensure they are categorized correctly. A failure to properly classify a worker may lead to significant consequences, including employment and wage and hour claims.
Topics
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

In The News
Aug 24, 2026
David Schultz Reviews a Humorous—But Important—FDCPA Procedural Ruling

Press Release
Aug 20, 2026
115 Hinshaw Lawyers Recognized in 2027 Editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and Ones to Watch®

Press Release
Aug 20, 2026
Hinshaw’s Landmark Tower Client Project Receives 2026 Top Projects Award

Press Release
Aug 19, 2026
Fernando Rivera-Maissonet Elected as HNBA Region II Governor and Board of Governors Member

Employment Law Observer
Aug 17, 2026
Massachusetts’ First Paid Family Medical Leave Act Verdict Yields $4.75 Million Award

Press Release
Aug 13, 2026
Lauren Campisi Recognized as a 2026 BTI Client Service All-Star by BTI Consulting Group

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Aug 13, 2026
How Will Banks Be Impacted by the Proposed Regulation O Amendments?

Press Release
Aug 12, 2026
William Cook Honored With the Distinguished Service Award by the Chicago Bar Association

Webinar
Aug 12, 2026
John Ryan Presents on "Understanding what is Covered Under the TCPA Today"

In The News
Aug 12, 2026
Scott Seaman Analyzes California’s New Pleading Standards for Excess Insurance Policy Claims


