A Win for Employers: Federal District Court Finds $100,000 H-1B Visa Petition Fee is Unlawful
In a decision favorable to US employers, universities, and healthcare providers, US District Court Judge Leo Sorokin, District of Massachusetts, ruled that the Trump Administration’s $100,000 H-1B visa petition fee is unlawful.
The ruling directly addresses a lawsuit co-led by Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell and California Attorney General Rob Bonta, alongside a coalition of 20 states.
Details of the Ruling
-
- The court held that the massive fee expansion violated the Administrative Procedures Act (APA).
-
- The court agreed with the plaintiffs that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) bypassed mandatory notice-and-comment procedures, preventing the public and affected businesses from weighing in on the rule before it was implemented.
- Historically, Congress has mandated that H-1B fees must remain reasonably tied to the actual administrative cost of processing the visas. A $100,000 surcharge vastly exceeded those costs.
-
- Furthermore, Judge Sorokin held that the fee was a tax on the H-1B program, which is unconstitutional because the President has no authority to levy a tax absent a statutory delegation by Congress, and the government had not shown that Congress delegated its taxing power to the President through the Immigration and Nationality Act.
- The court held that the massive fee expansion violated the Administrative Procedures Act (APA).
Significance for Employers
While this development gives businesses some immediate relief, immigration litigation remains highly fluid. The federal government is expected to seek an emergency stay or appeal this ruling.
Please feel free to reach out to Hinshaw’s Immigration Team if you have any questions about the implications of this decision.
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 17, 2026
Federal and State Regulators Continue Crackdown on Junk Fees

Press Release
Sep 17, 2026
Defense Verdict Reduces $134 Million Demand to $2 Million in Catastrophic Motorcycle Injury Case

Insights for Insurers Alert
Sep 16, 2026
America 250: The Nation’s Unique Contributions to Insurance Coverage Law and Litigation

In The News
Sep 15, 2026
Lucy Wang Discusses the California Insurance Commissioner’s Role in Protecting Consumers

Press Release
Sep 10, 2026
Hinshaw Attorneys Recognized as 2027 Lexology Index Thought Leaders: USA

In The News
Sep 10, 2026
Nicholas Ajello and Gregory Emry Analyze FAA’s Proposed BVLOS Drone Regulations

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 9, 2026
“Play Now, Arbitrate Later”—“Not So Fast,” Ninth Circuit Says

In The News
Sep 9, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Discusses “Patchwork” of Laws Targeting Personalized Pricing

Employment Law Observer
Sep 8, 2026
Five Workplace Issues Every Employer Should Address Before They Become a Costly Lawsuit

Press Release
Sep 8, 2026
Jim Sandy Appointed Chair of ABA Debt Collection and Bankruptcy Subcommittee




