The Illinois Supreme Court Strikes Down Illinois Eavesdropping Law As Unconstitutional
Hinshaw Alert | 1 min read
Mar 26, 2014
The Illinois Supreme Court struck down section 14-2 of the Criminal Code of 1961 ("The 1961 Illinois Eavesdropping Act") in violation of the public's first amendment and due process rights. The 1961 Illinois Eavesdropping Act (as amended in 1994) makes it illegal for a person to knowingly and intentionally record a public or private conversation unless all parties involved agreed to have the conversation recorded.
The Illinois Supreme Court considered two related audio recording cases and unanimously decided the Act was unconstitutional. The Court noted that currently, the Act is so broad it criminalizes recording a wide range of conversations that are clearly public such as "a loud argument on the street," "the public interactions of police officers with citizens," or "any conversation loud enough that the speakers should expect to be heard by others." In People v. Melongo, the Court held, "[T]he recording provision of the eavesdropping statute, burdens substantially more speech than is necessary to serve a legitimate state interest in protecting conversational privacy." However, in People v. Clark, the Court noted that truly private conversations should be protected from eavesdropping because "the fear of having private conversations exposed to the public may have a chilling effect on private speech."
These decisions put pressure on the Illinois State legislature to overhaul the 1961 Illinois Eavesdropping Act and draft a statute that protects private conversations without criminalizing the recording of clearly public conversations.
For more information, please contact Conrad C. Nowak or your regular Hinshaw attorney.
This alert has been prepared by Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. It is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship.
Featured Insights

Employment Law Observer
Aug 10, 2026
As Leaves Fall, Leave Requests Rise: Are You Compliant With Chicago’s Expanded Rules?

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report
