Standard of Care Opinions Offered Outside an Expert's Specialty Barred
Healthcare Alert | 1 min read
Dec 17, 2020
Issue
Can a physician offer standard of care opinions outside of his or her area of expertise?
Case Summary
Plaintiff alleged medical negligence against defendants for failure to provide appropriate treatment and diagnose him with sepsis. As a result, plaintiff claimed that he developed toxic shock syndrome requiring below the knee amputation of both legs. At trial, the jury found in favor of defendants.
On appeal, plaintiff argued that the trial court committed reversible error by barring his critical care expert from testifying to the standard of care for diagnosing sepsis. The trial court had barred this testimony because the expert was not the same specialty as the defendant physician, who was board certified in family medicine. The appellate court commented that whether an "expert is qualified to testify is not dependent on whether he is a member of the same specialty or subspecialty as the defendant, but rather, whether the allegations of negligence concern matters within his knowledge and observation." Despite this, the court found that there was no harm done in preventing the expert critical care physician from testifying as to the standard of care given that plaintiff disclosed a separate family medicine physician witness who testified extensively as to the standard of care for diagnosing and treating sepsis.
Takeaways
If an expert intends to offer standard of care opinions outside his or her specialty, the 213 expert disclosure should establish how the expert is familiar with the methods, procedures, and treatments at issue. Furthermore, the 213 report should disclose with specificity that the expert will offer testimony on the standard of care for a given specialty.
>> Return to Hinshaw's Annual Guide to Illinois Medical Malpractice Decisions: 2020 Edition
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Employment Law Observer
Aug 10, 2026
As Leaves Fall, Leave Requests Rise: Are You Compliant With Chicago’s Expanded Rules?

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

