SCOTUS Determines Foreclosure Firm is Not a Debt Collector Under the FDCPA's Primary Definition
Less than three months after hearing oral arguments in Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP, Case No. 17-1307, the United States Supreme Court held, in a 9-0 decision, that a business engaged in nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings is not a "debt collector" under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA, "the Act"), except for the limited prohibitions set forth in 1692(f)(6). The decision provides helpful guidance to law firms and loan servicers who pursue nonjudicial foreclosures.
The Court focused primarily on the plain language of the Act, noting that while the definition of "debt collector" is broad enough to encompass those enforcing a mortgage security interest, because 1692(f)(6) states that a "debt collector" "also includes" a business "the principal purpose of which is the enforcement of security interest," the Act's primary definition of "debt collector" does not include such an entity. To read the Act's primary definition of "debt collector" as including entities seeking to enforce security interests would render 1692(f)(6) superfluous. In further support of this reading, the Court noted that Congress likely sought to avoid conflicts with state nonjudicial foreclosure schemes by limiting the Act's application in relation to entities enforcing security interests. Finally, the Court reviewed the legislative history, which reflects that the FDCPA was enacted through compromise in relation to whether enforcing a security interest should be considered debt collection.
In addition to providing guidance to law firms and loan servicers who pursue nonjudicial foreclosures, the decision resolves the existing conflicts between the federal circuits. Previously, the 9th and 10th Circuits held that the FDCPA's general definition of "debt collector" does not apply to entities seeking to enforce a security interest in a nonjudicial foreclosure and the 3rd, 4th, and 5th Circuits held that the FDCPA governed nonjudicial foreclosures.
Featured Insights

Event
Apr 23, 2026
Driving Ahead: Insights from Industry Leaders Auto Finance Seminar

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Mar 13, 2026
DOJ Settlement with Car Retailer Highlights SCRA Repossession Risks

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Mar 11, 2026
Compliance Considerations for GDPR Consent in Biotech Clinical Research

Press Release
Mar 4, 2026
Marcia Mueller Named the 2026 Mentorship Award Winner by YWCA Northwestern Illinois

Press Release
Mar 3, 2026
Hinshaw Announces New Administrative Leadership Appointments

In The News
Feb 27, 2026
Hinshaw Partners Examine Implications for Nursing Homes of New Illinois Aid-in-Dying Law

In The News
Feb 24, 2026
Lucy Wang Authors Law360 “Expert Analysis” on Why Attorney Civility Means More in 2026

Press Release
Feb 13, 2026
Hinshaw Team Wins Appeal in Criminal Indictment of Waukegan City Clerk Janet Kilkelly

Press Release
Feb 10, 2026
Hinshaw Trial Team Secures $0 Defense Verdict in $15 Million Auto Accident Trial

Press Release
Feb 5, 2026
Hinshaw Legal Team Secures Directed Verdict in Florida Equine Fraud Case

Press Release
Feb 4, 2026
Hinshaw Celebrates 17 Consecutive Years of Being Named an Equality 100 Award Winner
![[Video] New Regulatory Priorities Under Mayor Mamdani’s NYC Department of Consumer and Worker Protection](/a/web/oHiTWa7kRy3Ht1brq6k4BT/bkMx39/new-york-city-skyline.jpg)
