SCOTUS Determines Foreclosure Firm is Not a Debt Collector Under the FDCPA's Primary Definition
Less than three months after hearing oral arguments in Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP, Case No. 17-1307, the United States Supreme Court held, in a 9-0 decision, that a business engaged in nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings is not a "debt collector" under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA, "the Act"), except for the limited prohibitions set forth in 1692(f)(6). The decision provides helpful guidance to law firms and loan servicers who pursue nonjudicial foreclosures.
The Court focused primarily on the plain language of the Act, noting that while the definition of "debt collector" is broad enough to encompass those enforcing a mortgage security interest, because 1692(f)(6) states that a "debt collector" "also includes" a business "the principal purpose of which is the enforcement of security interest," the Act's primary definition of "debt collector" does not include such an entity. To read the Act's primary definition of "debt collector" as including entities seeking to enforce security interests would render 1692(f)(6) superfluous. In further support of this reading, the Court noted that Congress likely sought to avoid conflicts with state nonjudicial foreclosure schemes by limiting the Act's application in relation to entities enforcing security interests. Finally, the Court reviewed the legislative history, which reflects that the FDCPA was enacted through compromise in relation to whether enforcing a security interest should be considered debt collection.
In addition to providing guidance to law firms and loan servicers who pursue nonjudicial foreclosures, the decision resolves the existing conflicts between the federal circuits. Previously, the 9th and 10th Circuits held that the FDCPA's general definition of "debt collector" does not apply to entities seeking to enforce a security interest in a nonjudicial foreclosure and the 3rd, 4th, and 5th Circuits held that the FDCPA governed nonjudicial foreclosures.
Featured Insights

In The News
Oct 23, 2026
Michael Dowell Discusses Potential Impact of Proposition 44 on California Community Clinics

In The News
Oct 21, 2026
Scott Seaman Says Walmart Ruling is an "Aberration" in the Opioid Insurance Battle

Event
October 21 – 23, 2026
D.L. Morriss Presents on International Banking Litigation and AI Regulation

Press Release
Oct 20, 2026
Seasoned Litigator Joins Hinshaw's Aviation and Aerospace Team in Chicago

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Oct 19, 2026
Refile, Repeat: Ohio’s Savings Statute Allows for Unlimited Bites of a Time-Barred Claim

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Oct 16, 2026
Key Takeaways from the 2026 ACVL Conference for the Auto Finance Industry

Press Release
Oct 16, 2026
Nia Binns Re-Appointed Health and Wellness Committee Co-Chair of the BWLA

In The News
Oct 16, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Explains How Bond Request Spurred AG Settlement in Paramount Merger

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Oct 15, 2026
OCC Releases Debanking Report on Largest Banks; CFPB Announces Follow-On Initiative



