SCOTUS Determines Foreclosure Firm is Not a Debt Collector Under the FDCPA's Primary Definition
Less than three months after hearing oral arguments in Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP, Case No. 17-1307, the United States Supreme Court held, in a 9-0 decision, that a business engaged in nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings is not a "debt collector" under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA, "the Act"), except for the limited prohibitions set forth in 1692(f)(6). The decision provides helpful guidance to law firms and loan servicers who pursue nonjudicial foreclosures.
The Court focused primarily on the plain language of the Act, noting that while the definition of "debt collector" is broad enough to encompass those enforcing a mortgage security interest, because 1692(f)(6) states that a "debt collector" "also includes" a business "the principal purpose of which is the enforcement of security interest," the Act's primary definition of "debt collector" does not include such an entity. To read the Act's primary definition of "debt collector" as including entities seeking to enforce security interests would render 1692(f)(6) superfluous. In further support of this reading, the Court noted that Congress likely sought to avoid conflicts with state nonjudicial foreclosure schemes by limiting the Act's application in relation to entities enforcing security interests. Finally, the Court reviewed the legislative history, which reflects that the FDCPA was enacted through compromise in relation to whether enforcing a security interest should be considered debt collection.
In addition to providing guidance to law firms and loan servicers who pursue nonjudicial foreclosures, the decision resolves the existing conflicts between the federal circuits. Previously, the 9th and 10th Circuits held that the FDCPA's general definition of "debt collector" does not apply to entities seeking to enforce a security interest in a nonjudicial foreclosure and the 3rd, 4th, and 5th Circuits held that the FDCPA governed nonjudicial foreclosures.
Featured Insights

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
May 14, 2026
Key Takeaways from the 2026 MBA Legal Issues and Regulatory Compliance Conference

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
May 14, 2026
SCOTUS Confirms: Federal Courts Retain Power to Affirm or Vacate an Arbitration Decision

In The News
May 13, 2026
Hinshaw Contributes Chapters to “Wrongful-Death and Survival Actions” IICLE Handbook

In The News
May 12, 2026
Hinshaw GC Steve Puiszis Discusses Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in an AI Age

Event
May 12-13, 2026
Mitchel Chargo Speaks on the Rapidly Evolving Cannabis Industry

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
May 11, 2026
Tennessee Reaches Settlement with Mariner in Multistate UDAAP Enforcement Action

Press Release
May 11, 2026
Ali Degan Elected to the Fellows of the American Bar Foundation

Press Release
May 11, 2026
John Weedon Re-Elected to the Jacksonville Bar Association’s Board of Governors in 2026

Press Release
May 7, 2026
Hinshaw Recognized as a 2026 BTI Associate Satisfaction A-Lister Firm



