New York Courts Lift Suspension of Foreclosure Proceedings, Add Additional Conference Requirement
On July 24, 2020, the New York State Courts issued Administrative Order 157/20 (AO/157/20). Effective July 27, 2020, AO/157/20 removes the formal suspension of all residential foreclosures, but keeps a limited suspension of commercial foreclosures in place until August 19, 2020. Under this new directive, foreclosure actions can be resumed by courts first scheduling at least one conference. Those conferences are expected to be the same as the mandatory CPLR 3408 settlement conferences—even if settlement conferences were previously held—because the courts were directed to consider all aspects of the case, including "the effects, if any, that the COVID-19 pandemic has had upon the parties."

The suspension of commercial foreclosures applies only where the mortgagor is eligible for unemployment insurance or is "otherwise facing financial hardship due to the COVID-19 pandemic." This language appears to be broad enough to cover almost all commercial mortgagors and does not exclude defaults unrelated to and occurring before the pandemic. While commencement and enforcement of commercial foreclosures are stayed, existing commercial foreclosures may proceed up to the point of judgment. Practically speaking, unless this suspension is continued beyond August 19, 2020, commercial foreclosures should be able to proceed, including through judgment, with auctions, beginning on October 15, 2020.
Although AO/157/20 encourages remote proceedings, the courts previously expressed a preference for in-person appearances where litigants are unrepresented. It is expected that the courts will focus on cases where both sides are represented. Finally, electronic filings remain a priority and are mandatory for represented parties. Unrepresented litigants may continue to mail papers to the clerk or file in-person, unless they opt into electronic filing.
It should be noted that there is no carve-out for properties that are not owner-occupied. The concern has always been protecting homeowners. We hope the courts will implement procedures soon to allow identification of certain cases that should not be subject to the mandatory settlement conference requirements to proceed more expeditiously.
Topics
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology

In The News
Jul 27, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses How the Insurance Industry Contributed to the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jul 27, 2026
Compliance Guidance for the New Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (VDPOSA)

Healthcare Alert
Jul 24, 2026
Q&A: Right to Electronic Monitoring Extended to Illinois Assisted and Shared Living Facilities

Press Release
Jul 23, 2026
Insurance Partner Christophe Burusco Joins Hinshaw in Los Angeles

In The News
Jul 16, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Anticipates Epic Battle Between “Titans of the Antitrust Bar”

