FCC Clarifies Autodialer Definition, Including in Bulk Text Message Context
2 min read
Jul 8, 2020
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently issued a Declaratory Ruling clarifying the definition of an autodialer. Exactly what constitutes an autodialer under the TCPA has been a burgeoning topic in consumer litigation. The TCPA prohibits any person from texting or calling a cellular telephone number using an automatic dialing system (“autodialer” or “ATDS”) without prior express consent. The TCPA defines an ATDS as equipment which has the capacity to (A) to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator; and (B) to dial such numbers.
In 2018, the P2P Alliance, a coalition of providers and users of peer-to-peer text messaging, submitted a petition to the FCC asking for clarification on whether its messaging is subject to the TCPA. In response to P2P Alliance’s petition, the FCC’s Declaratory Ruling clarified and affirmed the following three issues:
- The fact that calling equipment is used to make calls or send texts to a large volume of telephone numbers is not probative of whether the equipment is an autodialer under the TCPA.
- Whether the calling equipment is an autodialer turns on whether the equipment is capable of dialing random or sequential telephone numbers without human intervention.
- Even when an entity uses an autodialer to call or send text messages to a telephone number, it may still avoid TCPA liability by obtaining the recipient’s prior express consent.
The FCC’s June 25th ruling does not take a position on whether any particular text equipment is an autodialer, but provides clarification for entities using dialing or texting platforms that can be subject to the TCPA. The FCC’s ruling aligns with the Seventh and Eleventh Circuits on the definition of an autodialer. However, it conflicts with a Ninth Circuit ruling, which held that an ATDS includes equipment that can automatically dial telephone numbers stored in a list.
The FCC ruling provides some helpful guidance to entities within the industry, given the circuit split described above.
Related Content
"SCOTUS Decides Federal Debt Not Exempted from TCPA," July 09, 2020
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Employment Law Observer
Aug 10, 2026
As Leaves Fall, Leave Requests Rise: Are You Compliant With Chicago’s Expanded Rules?

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

