FCC Clarifies Autodialer Definition, Including in Bulk Text Message Context
2 min read
Jul 8, 2020
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently issued a Declaratory Ruling clarifying the definition of an autodialer. Exactly what constitutes an autodialer under the TCPA has been a burgeoning topic in consumer litigation. The TCPA prohibits any person from texting or calling a cellular telephone number using an automatic dialing system (“autodialer” or “ATDS”) without prior express consent. The TCPA defines an ATDS as equipment which has the capacity to (A) to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator; and (B) to dial such numbers.
In 2018, the P2P Alliance, a coalition of providers and users of peer-to-peer text messaging, submitted a petition to the FCC asking for clarification on whether its messaging is subject to the TCPA. In response to P2P Alliance’s petition, the FCC’s Declaratory Ruling clarified and affirmed the following three issues:
- The fact that calling equipment is used to make calls or send texts to a large volume of telephone numbers is not probative of whether the equipment is an autodialer under the TCPA.
- Whether the calling equipment is an autodialer turns on whether the equipment is capable of dialing random or sequential telephone numbers without human intervention.
- Even when an entity uses an autodialer to call or send text messages to a telephone number, it may still avoid TCPA liability by obtaining the recipient’s prior express consent.
The FCC’s June 25th ruling does not take a position on whether any particular text equipment is an autodialer, but provides clarification for entities using dialing or texting platforms that can be subject to the TCPA. The FCC’s ruling aligns with the Seventh and Eleventh Circuits on the definition of an autodialer. However, it conflicts with a Ninth Circuit ruling, which held that an ATDS includes equipment that can automatically dial telephone numbers stored in a list.
The FCC ruling provides some helpful guidance to entities within the industry, given the circuit split described above.
Related Content
"SCOTUS Decides Federal Debt Not Exempted from TCPA," July 09, 2020
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

In The News
Jul 16, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Anticipates Epic Battle Between “Titans of the Antitrust Bar”

Press Release
Jul 15, 2026
Two Hinshaw Partners Recognized in Minnesota Monthly's 2026 Top Lawyers in Minnesota

Event
July 13-15, 2026
Hinshaw Proudly Sponsors 2026 Lavender Law Conference and Career Fair

Webinar
Jul 14, 2026
Scott Seaman Presents on Horizontal vs. Vertical Exhaustion of Insurance

Healthcare Alert
Jul 8, 2026
A New Era of Compliance Standards for California DSOs and MSOs After the Aspen Dental Settlement

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 7, 2026
What Insurers Need to Know About California’s FAIR Plan Assessment Recoupment Guidance

In The News
Jul 6, 2026
Francesco Palanda’s Practical Guide for Mitigating AI-Related Business Interruption Risk

Lawyers' Lawyer Newsletter
Jun 29, 2026
Beyond Malpractice: The Rising Threat of Privacy and Statutory Claims Against Lawyers



