Utah Becomes the Second U.S. State to Establish Affirmative Defenses for Data Breach
Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert | 1 min read
Mar 22, 2021
In enacting the Cybersecurity Affirmative Defense Act, HB80, (Act) on March 11, 2021, Utah became the second state in the U.S. to create affirmative defenses for “persons” to certain causes of action arising out of a breach of system security.[1]
“Persons” is defined to include individuals, associations, corporations, partnerships, and other business entities.
The Act provides protection to persons that create, maintain, and reasonably comply with industry-recognized cybersecurity regulations, like the NIST, ISO 2700, and the HIPAA Security Rule, among others identified in the Act. The written cybersecurity program must provide administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to protect personal information.
The Act establishes the following three (3) affirmative defenses to tort-based claims brought under Utah law in a Utah state court:
- A person that creates, maintains, and reasonably compiles with written industry-recognized cybersecurity regulations that were in place at the time of the breach has an affirmative defense to a claim that the person failed to implement reasonable information security controls that resulted in the breach;
- A person that creates, maintains, and reasonably complies with their program and also had in place protocols for responding to a breach of system security at the time of the breach has an affirmative defense to a claim that the person failed to appropriately respond to a breach of a security system; and
- A person that creates, maintains, and reasonably compiles with their program and also had in place protocols for notifying an individual about a breach at the time of the breach has an affirmative defense to a claim that the person failed to appropriately notify an individual whose personal information was compromised in a breach of a security system.
The affirmative defenses established in the Act are generally not available in circumstances where the person had notice of a threat or hazard.
The Act expressly states that it does not create a private right of action for failing to comply with its provisions.
[1] Ohio was the first state to establish affirmative defenses with the OH Data Protection Act in 2018.
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Employment Law Observer
Aug 10, 2026
As Leaves Fall, Leave Requests Rise: Are You Compliant With Chicago’s Expanded Rules?

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

