Utah Becomes the Second U.S. State to Establish Affirmative Defenses for Data Breach
Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert | 1 min read
Mar 22, 2021
In enacting the Cybersecurity Affirmative Defense Act, HB80, (Act) on March 11, 2021, Utah became the second state in the U.S. to create affirmative defenses for “persons” to certain causes of action arising out of a breach of system security.[1]
“Persons” is defined to include individuals, associations, corporations, partnerships, and other business entities.
The Act provides protection to persons that create, maintain, and reasonably comply with industry-recognized cybersecurity regulations, like the NIST, ISO 2700, and the HIPAA Security Rule, among others identified in the Act. The written cybersecurity program must provide administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to protect personal information.
The Act establishes the following three (3) affirmative defenses to tort-based claims brought under Utah law in a Utah state court:
- A person that creates, maintains, and reasonably compiles with written industry-recognized cybersecurity regulations that were in place at the time of the breach has an affirmative defense to a claim that the person failed to implement reasonable information security controls that resulted in the breach;
- A person that creates, maintains, and reasonably complies with their program and also had in place protocols for responding to a breach of system security at the time of the breach has an affirmative defense to a claim that the person failed to appropriately respond to a breach of a security system; and
- A person that creates, maintains, and reasonably compiles with their program and also had in place protocols for notifying an individual about a breach at the time of the breach has an affirmative defense to a claim that the person failed to appropriately notify an individual whose personal information was compromised in a breach of a security system.
The affirmative defenses established in the Act are generally not available in circumstances where the person had notice of a threat or hazard.
The Act expressly states that it does not create a private right of action for failing to comply with its provisions.
[1] Ohio was the first state to establish affirmative defenses with the OH Data Protection Act in 2018.
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Webinar
Apr 29, 2026
When a Cyber Breach Hits: Cybersecurity, Privacy, and Compliance

In The News
Apr 29, 2026
Lauren Campisi Featured in the 20th Anniversary of Louisiana Super Lawyers Magazine

In The News
Apr 28, 2026
Matt Henderson Provides Media Insights as Conflict of Interest Lawsuits Target Law Firms

In The News
Apr 28, 2026
Akeela White Analyzes US House Hearing on Credit Reporting Compliance Reforms

In The News
Apr 24, 2026
Michael Dowell Reviews New PBM Reform Reshaping Pharmacy Reimbursement

Lawyers for the Profession® Alert
Apr 21, 2026
When Does a Client’s Duty to Investigate Begin? Lessons from a Time-Barred Malpractice Case

Press Release
Apr 20, 2026
Tom Kuzmanovic Selected for BizTimes Milwaukee 2026 Notable Leaders in Law

Press Release
Apr 17, 2026
André Sesler Elected to the Board of Trustees of the University of Florida Law Center Association

Hinshaw Alert
Apr 17, 2026
Q&A: How to Submit Your IEEPA Refund Claim as CAPE Portal Launches April 20, 2026



