Amendments Proposed to New York's Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act
Insights for Insurers Alert | 2 min read
Jan 21, 2022
The New York State Senate Rules Committee recently approved Senate Bill S7882, and that amended bill is now waiting for formal presentation to both the Senate and the Assembly. If passed and signed by Governor Hochul, the amendments would modify the recently enacted Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act as follows:
- Compliance with the new CPLR 3101(f) provisions is no longer retroactive and is only required for actions filed on or after December 31, 2021.
- The amendments would alter the time limit to comply with CPLR 3101(f) from 60 days to 90 days.
- Defendants must provide copies of the "declarations, insuring agreements, conditions, exclusions, endorsements, and similar provisions" of any policy that relates to the claim being litigated.
- With plaintiff's written consent, a defendant would only need to provide a copy of the policy's declaration page, but, the plaintiff could revoke its consent or request a complete copy of the policy at any time thereafter.
- Only insurance policies that "relate to the claim being litigated" need to be disclosed.
- Only the name and email address of a person responsible for adjusting the claim must be provided.
- Only the total limits available under the policy, which is defined as the "actual funds, after taking into account erosion and any other offsets," need to be disclosed.
- Defendants are only required to make "reasonable efforts" to ensure the information previously disclosed is accurate, complete, and up-to-date at specific stages of the litigation, including: (i) when the note of issue is filed; (ii) when entering into any formal settlement negotiations conducted or supervised by the court; (iii) at voluntary mediation; and (iv) when the case is called for trial.
- Defendants no longer need to disclose the application for insurance.
- The policy and its limits would still be inadmissible at trial.
- The proposed amendments still require certification by both the defendant and its counsel.
- Actions brought to recover PIP/no-fault benefits are excluded from these disclosure requirements.
While these amendments are a step in the right direction, the practical effects of the Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act will still place an undue burden on both carriers and defense counsel. To learn more about the Act or for assistance in preparing to comply with the Act's onerous requirements, please contact your Hinshaw attorney.
Related People
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
May 21, 2026
Deploying AI Companions in Elder Care: A Privacy Compliance Playbook

Press Release
May 20, 2026
Hinshaw Releases America 250 Book Exploring Insurance's Role in Building the United States

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
May 19, 2026
OCC's Final Escrow-Interest Preemption Rules Bolster the Second Circuit’s Cantero Decision

Webinar
May 19, 2026
Scott Seaman Speaks on Making Decisions in Difficult Risk Environments

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
May 14, 2026
Key Takeaways from the 2026 MBA Legal Issues and Regulatory Compliance Conference

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
May 14, 2026
SCOTUS Confirms: Federal Courts Retain Power to Affirm or Vacate an Arbitration Decision

In The News
May 13, 2026
Hinshaw Contributes Chapters to “Wrongful-Death and Survival Actions” IICLE Handbook

In The News
May 12, 2026
Hinshaw GC Steve Puiszis Discusses Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in an AI Age

Event
May 12-13, 2026
Mitchel Chargo Speaks on the Rapidly Evolving Cannabis Industry

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
May 11, 2026
Tennessee Reaches Settlement with Mariner in Multistate UDAAP Enforcement Action

Press Release
May 11, 2026
Ali Degan Elected to the Fellows of the American Bar Foundation


