5 New USCIS Clarifications for Individuals With H-1B Status
Insights for Employers Alert | 1 min read
Jul 30, 2024
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has published a new FAQ to provide clarity and potentially encourage entrepreneurship among individuals with H-1B status. This FAQ contains a number of helpful updates and clarifications, including the following:
1. Once an I-140 immigrant petition is approved on behalf of an individual with H-1B status, their priority date is locked in. The only way the individual can lose their priority date is if the I-140 approval is revoked on certain grounds, such as agency error, fraud, or willful misrepresentation of a material fact.
2. Once an I-140 immigrant petition has been filed on an individual's behalf and has been approved for at least 180 days, USCIS will not revoke the approval solely because the employer withdraws that approval. The priority date and ability to extend H-1B beyond six years remain unaffected.
3. Individuals with H-1B status are not required to be the beneficiary of an approved Form I-140 for the entire time they are waiting for an immigrant visa to become available.
4. If H-1B employment is terminated, either voluntarily or involuntarily, the individual can typically take one of several actions to remain in a period of authorized stay in the United States beyond 60 days, including filing for a change of nonimmigrant status, filing for adjustment of status, filing for a compelling circumstances EAD card, or be the beneficiary of a nonfrivolous petition to change H-1B employers.
5. A company may qualify as an employer and petition for H-1B status on an individual's behalf if the H-1B beneficiary has a controlling interest (more than 50 percent ownership or majority rights).
The full FAQ can be found here on the USCIS website.
If you have questions or would like to schedule a consultation to discuss these important immigration programs, please contact please contact our immigration services team.
Featured Insights

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology

In The News
Jul 27, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses How the Insurance Industry Contributed to the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jul 27, 2026
Compliance Guidance for the New Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (VDPOSA)

Healthcare Alert
Jul 24, 2026
Q&A: Right to Electronic Monitoring Extended to Illinois Assisted and Shared Living Facilities

Press Release
Jul 23, 2026
Insurance Partner Christophe Burusco Joins Hinshaw in Los Angeles

In The News
Jul 16, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Anticipates Epic Battle Between “Titans of the Antitrust Bar”

Press Release
Jul 15, 2026
Two Hinshaw Partners Recognized in Minnesota Monthly's 2026 Top Lawyers in Minnesota




