David Schultz Analyzes in ARM Compliance Digest: State Appeals Court Affirms Ruling for Defendant in FDCPA Class Action
In The News | 1 min read
Apr 3, 2024
In the April 2, 2024, edition of the ARM Compliance Digest, Hinshaw partner David Schultz discussed a favorable ruling made by a New Jersey appeals court for a defendant sued in a class action for seeking to collect on debt that has aged beyond the statute of limitations. The court concluded that a standard statute of limitations disclosure provided by the defendant was not materially deceptive.
Schultz writes:
Woodhouse v Heartland Resolution Group is the most recent ruling on efforts to collect debt that has aged beyond the statute of limitations for a timely collection lawsuit (i.e., "out of statute debt"). It is a good ruling that approves of a somewhat common disclosure.
In the past dozen years there has been a lot of litigation over efforts to collect on out of statute debt. The genesis of the theory was a CFPB consent decree from a dozen years ago that required an agency to use disclosures when collecting this aged debt. After that, there was a wave of federal lawsuits for not using an out of statute disclosure. The industry responded by adopting disclosures, which often were based on the CFPB consent decree language or recently enacted State laws. Then, in the category of "no good deed goes unpunished," we saw a new group of lawsuits that picked over the disclosures being used. Those lawsuits often were not particularly successful and eventually slowed down significantly. Interestingly, the CFPB studied the issue for years and issued Reg F, in which it decided not to provide a safe harbor language for use when collecting on out of statute debt. That was a bit of a surprise.
One of the things we are seeing in response to the federal court Article III rulings is that some older plaintiff FDCPA theories are getting a revival in state court filings. The Woodhouse case seems like an example of that. Fortunately, the court rejected it soundly and hopefully other state courts will do the same.
Read the full April 2, 2024 edition of the AccountsRecovery.net Compliance Digest.
"State Appeals Court Affirms Ruling for Defendant in FDCPA Class Action" was published by ARM Compliance Digest on April 2, 2024.
Related People
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
Featured Insights

In The News
Sep 3, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Analyzes FTC Suit over Amazon’s Advertising Pricing Practices

In The News
Sep 2, 2026
Yvonne Ocrant Discusses Horse Business Legal Protection on the EquineRevShare Podcast

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 2, 2026
Two Key Wins for Mortgage Lenders on Illinois Statute of Limitations

Press Release
Sep 2, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Reappointed to CBA's Antitrust & Trade Regulation Section Executive Committee

Employment Law Observer
Sep 1, 2026
Illinois Employers: Prepare Now for These Three Employment Law Changes Taking Effect in 2027

In The News
Aug 24, 2026
David Schultz Reviews a Humorous—But Important—FDCPA Procedural Ruling

Press Release
Aug 20, 2026
115 Hinshaw Lawyers Recognized in 2027 Editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and Ones to Watch®

Press Release
Aug 20, 2026
Hinshaw’s Landmark Tower Client Project Receives 2026 Top Projects Award

Press Release
Aug 19, 2026
Fernando Rivera-Maissonet Elected as HNBA Region II Governor and Board of Governors Member




