David Schultz Analyzes in ARM Compliance Digest: State Appeals Court Affirms Ruling for Defendant in FDCPA Class Action
In The News | 1 min read
Apr 3, 2024
In the April 2, 2024, edition of the ARM Compliance Digest, Hinshaw partner David Schultz discussed a favorable ruling made by a New Jersey appeals court for a defendant sued in a class action for seeking to collect on debt that has aged beyond the statute of limitations. The court concluded that a standard statute of limitations disclosure provided by the defendant was not materially deceptive.
Schultz writes:
Woodhouse v Heartland Resolution Group is the most recent ruling on efforts to collect debt that has aged beyond the statute of limitations for a timely collection lawsuit (i.e., "out of statute debt"). It is a good ruling that approves of a somewhat common disclosure.
In the past dozen years there has been a lot of litigation over efforts to collect on out of statute debt. The genesis of the theory was a CFPB consent decree from a dozen years ago that required an agency to use disclosures when collecting this aged debt. After that, there was a wave of federal lawsuits for not using an out of statute disclosure. The industry responded by adopting disclosures, which often were based on the CFPB consent decree language or recently enacted State laws. Then, in the category of "no good deed goes unpunished," we saw a new group of lawsuits that picked over the disclosures being used. Those lawsuits often were not particularly successful and eventually slowed down significantly. Interestingly, the CFPB studied the issue for years and issued Reg F, in which it decided not to provide a safe harbor language for use when collecting on out of statute debt. That was a bit of a surprise.
One of the things we are seeing in response to the federal court Article III rulings is that some older plaintiff FDCPA theories are getting a revival in state court filings. The Woodhouse case seems like an example of that. Fortunately, the court rejected it soundly and hopefully other state courts will do the same.
Read the full April 2, 2024 edition of the AccountsRecovery.net Compliance Digest.
"State Appeals Court Affirms Ruling for Defendant in FDCPA Class Action" was published by ARM Compliance Digest on April 2, 2024.
Related People
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
Featured Insights

Press Release
Aug 13, 2026
Lauren Campisi Recognized as a 2026 BTI Client Service All-Star by BTI Consulting Group

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Aug 13, 2026
How Will Banks Be Impacted by the Proposed Regulation O Amendments?

Press Release
Aug 12, 2026
William Cook Honored With the Distinguished Service Award by the Chicago Bar Association

Webinar
Aug 12, 2026
John Ryan Presents on "Understanding what is Covered Under the TCPA Today"

In The News
Aug 12, 2026
Scott Seaman Analyzes California’s New Pleading Standards for Excess Insurance Policy Claims

Employment Law Observer
Aug 10, 2026
As Leaves Fall, Leave Requests Rise: Are You Compliant With Chicago’s Expanded Rules?

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law



