David Schultz Analyzes in ARM Compliance Digest: State Appeals Court Affirms Ruling for Defendant in FDCPA Class Action
In The News | 1 min read
Apr 3, 2024
In the April 2, 2024, edition of the ARM Compliance Digest, Hinshaw partner David Schultz discussed a favorable ruling made by a New Jersey appeals court for a defendant sued in a class action for seeking to collect on debt that has aged beyond the statute of limitations. The court concluded that a standard statute of limitations disclosure provided by the defendant was not materially deceptive.
Schultz writes:
Woodhouse v Heartland Resolution Group is the most recent ruling on efforts to collect debt that has aged beyond the statute of limitations for a timely collection lawsuit (i.e., "out of statute debt"). It is a good ruling that approves of a somewhat common disclosure.
In the past dozen years there has been a lot of litigation over efforts to collect on out of statute debt. The genesis of the theory was a CFPB consent decree from a dozen years ago that required an agency to use disclosures when collecting this aged debt. After that, there was a wave of federal lawsuits for not using an out of statute disclosure. The industry responded by adopting disclosures, which often were based on the CFPB consent decree language or recently enacted State laws. Then, in the category of "no good deed goes unpunished," we saw a new group of lawsuits that picked over the disclosures being used. Those lawsuits often were not particularly successful and eventually slowed down significantly. Interestingly, the CFPB studied the issue for years and issued Reg F, in which it decided not to provide a safe harbor language for use when collecting on out of statute debt. That was a bit of a surprise.
One of the things we are seeing in response to the federal court Article III rulings is that some older plaintiff FDCPA theories are getting a revival in state court filings. The Woodhouse case seems like an example of that. Fortunately, the court rejected it soundly and hopefully other state courts will do the same.
Read the full April 2, 2024 edition of the AccountsRecovery.net Compliance Digest.
"State Appeals Court Affirms Ruling for Defendant in FDCPA Class Action" was published by ARM Compliance Digest on April 2, 2024.
Related People
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
Featured Insights

Healthcare Alert
Jul 24, 2026
Q&A: Right to Electronic Monitoring Extended to Illinois Assisted and Shared Living Facilities

Press Release
Jul 23, 2026
Insurance Partner Christophe Burusco Joins Hinshaw in Los Angeles

In The News
Jul 16, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Anticipates Epic Battle Between “Titans of the Antitrust Bar”

Press Release
Jul 15, 2026
Two Hinshaw Partners Recognized in Minnesota Monthly's 2026 Top Lawyers in Minnesota

Event
July 13-15, 2026
Hinshaw Proudly Sponsors 2026 Lavender Law Conference and Career Fair

Webinar
Jul 14, 2026
Scott Seaman Presents on Horizontal vs. Vertical Exhaustion of Insurance

Healthcare Alert
Jul 8, 2026
A New Era of Compliance Standards for California DSOs and MSOs After the Aspen Dental Settlement

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 7, 2026
What Insurers Need to Know About California’s FAIR Plan Assessment Recoupment Guidance

In The News
Jul 6, 2026
Francesco Palanda’s Practical Guide for Mitigating AI-Related Business Interruption Risk



