David Schultz Analyzes in ARM Compliance Digest: State Appeals Court Affirms Ruling for Defendant in FDCPA Class Action
In The News | 1 min read
Apr 3, 2024
In the April 2, 2024, edition of the ARM Compliance Digest, Hinshaw partner David Schultz discussed a favorable ruling made by a New Jersey appeals court for a defendant sued in a class action for seeking to collect on debt that has aged beyond the statute of limitations. The court concluded that a standard statute of limitations disclosure provided by the defendant was not materially deceptive.
Schultz writes:
Woodhouse v Heartland Resolution Group is the most recent ruling on efforts to collect debt that has aged beyond the statute of limitations for a timely collection lawsuit (i.e., "out of statute debt"). It is a good ruling that approves of a somewhat common disclosure.
In the past dozen years there has been a lot of litigation over efforts to collect on out of statute debt. The genesis of the theory was a CFPB consent decree from a dozen years ago that required an agency to use disclosures when collecting this aged debt. After that, there was a wave of federal lawsuits for not using an out of statute disclosure. The industry responded by adopting disclosures, which often were based on the CFPB consent decree language or recently enacted State laws. Then, in the category of "no good deed goes unpunished," we saw a new group of lawsuits that picked over the disclosures being used. Those lawsuits often were not particularly successful and eventually slowed down significantly. Interestingly, the CFPB studied the issue for years and issued Reg F, in which it decided not to provide a safe harbor language for use when collecting on out of statute debt. That was a bit of a surprise.
One of the things we are seeing in response to the federal court Article III rulings is that some older plaintiff FDCPA theories are getting a revival in state court filings. The Woodhouse case seems like an example of that. Fortunately, the court rejected it soundly and hopefully other state courts will do the same.
Read the full April 2, 2024 edition of the AccountsRecovery.net Compliance Digest.
"State Appeals Court Affirms Ruling for Defendant in FDCPA Class Action" was published by ARM Compliance Digest on April 2, 2024.
Related People
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
Featured Insights

Webinar
Oct 29, 2026
Carol Rooney Presents on Building a Career in Appellate Practice

In The News
Oct 28, 2026
James Ferrara Comments in The New York Times on Stalled Boca Raton Luxury Condo Project

Insights for Insurers Alert
Oct 28, 2026
Insurance and Reinsurance Commutations, Run-Off, and Loss Portfolio Transfers

Healthcare Alert
Oct 27, 2026
Illinois Medical Aid-in-Dying Law Takes Effect Amid Legal Challenges

In The News
Oct 26, 2026
Scott Seaman Examines the Insurance Coverage Implications of a Recent NFL Concussion Ruling

In The News
Oct 23, 2026
Michael Dowell Discusses Potential Impact of Proposition 44 on California Community Clinics

In The News
Oct 21, 2026
Scott Seaman Says Walmart Ruling is an "Aberration" in the Opioid Insurance Battle

Event
October 21 – 23, 2026
D.L. Morriss Presents on International Banking Litigation and AI Regulation





