Health Care Providers Are Exempt From the Red Flags Rule
Healthcare Alert | 2 min read
Jan 4, 2011
Under the Red Flag Program Clarification Act of 2010 (RFPCA), health care providers and other businesses that accept deferred payment for goods and services are exempt from being classified as “creditors” for purposes of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, as amended by the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003. Such entities and individuals therefore do not have to comply with the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC’s) Red Flags Rule, which requires creditors to develop and implement written identity theft prevention programs. The RFPCA became effective on December 18, 2010.
A “creditor” under the RFPCA is any person or entity which regularly and in the ordinary course of business: (1) obtains or uses consumer reports, directly or indirectly, in connection with a credit transaction; (2) furnishes information to consumer reporting agencies in connection with a credit transaction; or (3) advances funds to or on behalf of a person, based on an obligation of the person to repay the funds, or repayable from specific property pledged by or on behalf of the person.
The application of the Red Flags Rule to certain professionals, including health care providers, accountants and attorneys, was controversial and led to the enactment of the RFPCA, which exempts from the definition of “creditor” any person or entity which “advances funds” under clause (3) above, but that does so “on behalf of a person for expenses incidental to a service provided by the creditor to that person.” Thus, a health care provider which provides medical services, but does not require payment in full at the time the service is rendered, is not a “creditor” for purposes of the Red Flags Rule, and therefore does not need to develop and implement written identity theft prevention programs designed to detect activities known as “red flags” that are signs of identity theft.
The FTC began enforcement of the Red Flags Rule against creditors on December 31, 2010. The enforcement deadline was delayed five times, with an original commencement date of November 1, 2008.
For more information, please contact your regular Hinshaw attorney.
This alert has been prepared by Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. It is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship.
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Event
Apr 23, 2026
Driving Ahead: Insights from Industry Leaders Auto Finance Seminar

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Mar 13, 2026
DOJ Settlement with Car Retailer Highlights SCRA Repossession Risks

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Mar 11, 2026
Compliance Considerations for GDPR Consent in Biotech Clinical Research

Press Release
Mar 4, 2026
Marcia Mueller Named the 2026 Mentorship Award Winner by YWCA Northwestern Illinois

Press Release
Mar 3, 2026
Hinshaw Announces New Administrative Leadership Appointments

In The News
Feb 27, 2026
Hinshaw Partners Examine Implications for Nursing Homes of New Illinois Aid-in-Dying Law

In The News
Feb 24, 2026
Lucy Wang Authors Law360 “Expert Analysis” on Why Attorney Civility Means More in 2026

Press Release
Feb 13, 2026
Hinshaw Team Wins Appeal in Criminal Indictment of Waukegan City Clerk Janet Kilkelly

Press Release
Feb 10, 2026
Hinshaw Trial Team Secures $0 Defense Verdict in $15 Million Auto Accident Trial

Press Release
Feb 5, 2026
Hinshaw Legal Team Secures Directed Verdict in Florida Equine Fraud Case

Press Release
Feb 4, 2026
Hinshaw Celebrates 17 Consecutive Years of Being Named an Equality 100 Award Winner
![[Video] New Regulatory Priorities Under Mayor Mamdani’s NYC Department of Consumer and Worker Protection](/a/web/oHiTWa7kRy3Ht1brq6k4BT/bkMx39/new-york-city-skyline.jpg)
