The 12 Days of California Labor & Employment Series – Day 10: Civil Penalties for Unpaid Wages
It's the end of the year and while everyone is busy, employers in California should be aware of new laws and regulations that go into effect on January 1, 2020. In the spirit of the season, we are using the "12 days of the holidays" to blog about one California law daily and its impact on California employers. On the tenth day of the holidays, my labor and employment attorney gave to me: ten pipers piping and AB 673.
California law currently provides for a civil penalty to be imposed on employers who fail to pay the wages of an employee as provided in specified provisions of the Labor Code. Current law requires the Labor Commissioner to recover that penalty as part of a hearing held to recover unpaid wages and penalties or in an independent civil action. In the independent civil action, a specified percentage of the penalty recovered is to be paid into a fund within the Labor and Workforce Development Agency dedicated to educating employers about state labor laws, and the remainder be paid into the State Treasury to the credit of the General Fund.
AB 673 amends California Labor Code Section 210 as of January 1, 2020, and authorizes an employee to bring a private right of action to recover specified statutory penalties against the employer as part of a hearing held to recover unpaid wages. The law also provides that an employee can select which action to file whether i
If an action is brought under California Labor Code Section 210, the employer is subject to $100 for each failure to pay each employee for any initial violation. For each subsequent violation, or any willful or intentional violation, the employer is subject to $200 for each failure to pay each employee plus 25% of the amount unlawfully withheld. The penalty shall either be recovered by the employee as a statutory penalty pursuant to Section 98 or by the Labor Commissioner as a civil penalty through the issuance of a citation.
In summary, an employee may select to file a private action before the Labor Commissioner or to seek to enforce civil penalties under PAGA. Employers should note that these remedies are in addition to penalties an employee may recover through an action brought by the Labor Commissioner. It is believed that most employees will start filing their own private right of action as it will put more money in their pocket. Under PAGA, 75% of the penalty goes to the State of California.
Wage and hour claims in California are common. Employers need to make sure their payroll procedures are as perfect as they can be to ensure that they are paying the proper amount of wages on a timely basis to each employee. If an employer works with a payroll company/provider, the employer should make sure that payroll provider is compliant and may want to consider a periodic audit of their practices through counsel to ensure compliance and mitigate mistakes. Good record-keeping is also necessary. When wages change, it should be documented to ensure a detailed paper trail. If a mistake is found, it is a best practice to remedy the mistake as quickly as possible with any required penalty. Lastly, an employer should be prepared to maintain all wage records for four years after an employee ceases to be an employee to protect itself the best it can for future litigation.
Topics
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Employment Law Observer
Aug 10, 2026
As Leaves Fall, Leave Requests Rise: Are You Compliant With Chicago’s Expanded Rules?

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

