Religious Exemptions to COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates Do Not Include Political, Social, Economic Beliefs, According to EEOC
3 min read
Nov 24, 2021
On November 5, 2021, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issued an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS). It required employers of 100 or more employees to institute mandates requiring employees to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19—or require weekly testing of its employees. That same day, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) similarly issued an Interim Final Rule (IFR) requiring the workforces of Medicare- and Medicaid-certified providers and suppliers to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 in order for Medicare and Medicaid facilities to continue participation in those programs. Many employers have also instituted COVID-19 vaccination mandates for their employees separate from OSHA’s ETS and CMS’s IFR.
Regardless of whether an employer is following OSHA’s ETS, the CMS’s IFR, or has instituted its own vaccine mandate, employers must be aware that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII)—which protects employees based on their race, color, religion, sex, and national origin—requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations to employees for their sincerely held religious beliefs. Therefore, Title VII may require employers to provide religious exemptions to a vaccine mandate where it conflicts with the sincerely held religious beliefs of employees.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which enforces Title VII, has released technical assistance questions and answers to keep employers informed of how various employment discrimination laws apply to COVID-19. The EEOC is regularly updating its COVID-19 technical assistance.
One important update to the technical assistance occurred on October 26, 2021. In this update, the EEOC clarified that social, political, or economic views, as well as mere personal preferences, are not religious beliefs subject to a religious exemption from COVID-19 vaccine mandates. This clarification is important because employer vaccine mandates have become highly contentious, and employees may claim that their personal, political, or other non-religious beliefs exempt them from COVID-19 vaccine mandates. According to the EEOC’s guidance on religious accommodations, a religious belief is “a belief that occupies a place in the life of its possessor parallel to that filled by . . . God.” It can include “non-theistic moral or ethical beliefs as to what is right and wrong which are sincerely held with the strength of traditional religious views.” Religious beliefs typically concern “ultimate ideas” about “life, purpose, and death.” Whether a belief is religious is determined on a case-by-case basis. However, the EEOC is clear that beliefs that are merely political, social, economic, or personal do not qualify as protected religious beliefs.
If an employee has a purely political, social, economic, or personal objection to the COVID-19 vaccine, and the objection has no relation to religion, then, according to the EEOC, the employee does not qualify for a religious exemption to COVID-19 vaccine mandates under Title VII.
Employers should consult with their labor and employment attorney when assessing an employee’s request for an exemption to a COVID-19 vaccine mandate.
Additional Resources:
- Sixth Circuit Selected in Lottery Process to Preside Over Legal Challenges to OSHA's Vaccination ETS, November 17, 2021
- Fifth Circuit Grants Stay of OSHA's Mandatory Vaccination ETS, Voices "Grave Statutory and Constitutional" Concerns, November 15, 2021
- OSHA Issues ETS Requiring Employee COVID-19 Vaccinations, November 5, 2021
- FAQs: CMS Issues Emergency Regulation Mandating Workforce COVID-19 Vaccinations by Medicare/Medicaid-Certified Providers and Suppliers, November 9, 2021
Featured Insights

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology
