OSHA Announces Proposed Rule Change Expanding Authorized Employee Representation During Workplace Inspection to Include Union Officials and Other Non-Employees
On August 30, 2023, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend its regulations regarding who employees may authorize to act as their representative and accompany the Compliance Safety and Health Officer (CSHO) during physical workplace inspections. Under the NPRM, the employees may designate an employee of the employer or a non-employee third party whose relevant experience with particular hazards or conditions or language skills are deemed reasonably necessary to conduct an effective and thorough inspection by the CSHO. Specifically, the NPRM clarifies that these non-employees may include interpreters, officials with advocacy groups or local safety counsels, and union representatives.
Section 8(e) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (the Act) allows a representative of the employer and a representative authorized by the employees to accompany CSHOs during a physical workplace inspection. The Act's implementing regulation, 29 CFR 1903.8(c) (the Regulation), currently provides that any representative selected by the employee must be another employee unless the CSHO determines that a third-party representative, such as an industrial hygienist or a safety engineer, is "reasonably necessary" to conduct an effective and thorough physical inspection. In order to better reflect the Act's purpose of ensuring healthful and safe working conditions, the NPRM proposes to revise the Regulation by deleting the examples of "industrial hygienist or a safety engineer" such that the list of individuals authorized to participate in workplace inspections is non-exhaustive.
If enacted, the NPRM would not only authorize union representatives or other officials to act as employee representatives but also allow for the participation of union agents in physical workplace inspections regardless of whether the employee is represented by a union. This change could result in markedly greater union access to nonunion facilities and potentially lead to unionizing efforts. To this end, the implications of this NPRM are far-reaching, as business operations may be affected beyond the scope of the physical inspection for which the union agent was initially called upon to attend.
OSHA is accepting public comments on all aspects of the NPRM until October 30, 2023. View OSHA's announcement of the NPRM. View the NPRM.
A version of this post was originally published by the MEA Energy Association.
Topics
Featured Insights

Press Release
Aug 13, 2026
Lauren Campisi Recognized as a 2026 BTI Client Service All-Star by BTI Consulting Group

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Aug 13, 2026
How Will Banks Be Impacted by the Proposed Regulation O Amendments?

Press Release
Aug 12, 2026
William Cook Honored With the Distinguished Service Award by the Chicago Bar Association

Webinar
Aug 12, 2026
John Ryan Presents on "Understanding what is Covered Under the TCPA Today"

In The News
Aug 12, 2026
Scott Seaman Analyzes California’s New Pleading Standards for Excess Insurance Policy Claims

Employment Law Observer
Aug 10, 2026
As Leaves Fall, Leave Requests Rise: Are You Compliant With Chicago’s Expanded Rules?

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law


