OSHA Announces Proposed Rule Change Expanding Authorized Employee Representation During Workplace Inspection to Include Union Officials and Other Non-Employees
On August 30, 2023, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend its regulations regarding who employees may authorize to act as their representative and accompany the Compliance Safety and Health Officer (CSHO) during physical workplace inspections. Under the NPRM, the employees may designate an employee of the employer or a non-employee third party whose relevant experience with particular hazards or conditions or language skills are deemed reasonably necessary to conduct an effective and thorough inspection by the CSHO. Specifically, the NPRM clarifies that these non-employees may include interpreters, officials with advocacy groups or local safety counsels, and union representatives.
Section 8(e) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (the Act) allows a representative of the employer and a representative authorized by the employees to accompany CSHOs during a physical workplace inspection. The Act's implementing regulation, 29 CFR 1903.8(c) (the Regulation), currently provides that any representative selected by the employee must be another employee unless the CSHO determines that a third-party representative, such as an industrial hygienist or a safety engineer, is "reasonably necessary" to conduct an effective and thorough physical inspection. In order to better reflect the Act's purpose of ensuring healthful and safe working conditions, the NPRM proposes to revise the Regulation by deleting the examples of "industrial hygienist or a safety engineer" such that the list of individuals authorized to participate in workplace inspections is non-exhaustive.
If enacted, the NPRM would not only authorize union representatives or other officials to act as employee representatives but also allow for the participation of union agents in physical workplace inspections regardless of whether the employee is represented by a union. This change could result in markedly greater union access to nonunion facilities and potentially lead to unionizing efforts. To this end, the implications of this NPRM are far-reaching, as business operations may be affected beyond the scope of the physical inspection for which the union agent was initially called upon to attend.
OSHA is accepting public comments on all aspects of the NPRM until October 30, 2023. View OSHA's announcement of the NPRM. View the NPRM.
A version of this post was originally published by the MEA Energy Association.
Topics
Featured Insights

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
May 6, 2026
From Protection to Readiness: What Today’s Cyber Landscape Demands of Organizations

Press Release
Apr 30, 2026
Six-Attorney Team Joins Hinshaw’s Consumer Financial Services Group

In The News
Apr 29, 2026
Lauren Campisi Featured in the 20th Anniversary of Louisiana Super Lawyers Magazine

In The News
Apr 28, 2026
Matt Henderson Provides Media Insights as Conflict of Interest Lawsuits Target Law Firms

In The News
Apr 28, 2026
Akeela White Analyzes US House Hearing on Credit Reporting Compliance Reforms

In The News
Apr 24, 2026
Michael Dowell Reviews New PBM Reform Reshaping Pharmacy Reimbursement

Lawyers for the Profession® Alert
Apr 21, 2026
When Does a Client’s Duty to Investigate Begin? Lessons from a Time-Barred Malpractice Case

Press Release
Apr 20, 2026
Tom Kuzmanovic Selected for BizTimes Milwaukee 2026 Notable Leaders in Law




