Minneapolis and St. Paul Sick and Safe Time Ordinances Set to Take Effect July 1st
The sick time ordinances passed by both the Minneapolis and St. Paul City Councils take effect July 1, 2017. The Minneapolis Sick and Safe Time ordinance requires all employers with six or more employees to provide paid sick time; employers with five or less employees are required to provide unpaid sick time. The St. Paul Earned Sick and Safe Time ordinance will apply to all employers, regardless of size, but gives a six-month grace period to employers with 23 or fewer employees. Both cities have also included a deferral provision for new employers.
The ordinances require that employees accrue one hour of leave for every 30 hours worked, up to a maximum of 48 hours per year. Additionally, employees may carry over accrued but unused leave subject to an 80 hour cap. As originally written, each ordinance covered all employees, regardless of employer location, working in that city for at least 80 hours in one calendar year. That provision is currently on hold.
In January, the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and others sued in Hennepin County District Court seeking to halt the Minneapolis ordinance. The Court ruled that the ordinance can proceed as planned, but issued a temporary restraining order preventing the ordinance from impacting employers physically located outside of Minneapolis. The matter is currently on appeal, with oral arguments scheduled for July 11, 2017. The City of St. Paul will also be enforcing its ordinance only against employers physically located within St. Paul.
The ordinances also faced some uncertainty after the Minnesota legislature passed a state preemption bill. On May 30, 2017, Governor Mark Dayton ultimately vetoed the bill that would have prevented local employment law ordinances, including the Minneapolis and St. Paul sick and safe time ordinances.
Affected employers currently providing employees with sick time under an existing paid leave policy that "meets or exceeds, and does not otherwise conflict" with the ordinances are not required to provide additional sick time. However, employers should note that the ordinances are different from many employers' existing policies in that the ordinances apply to both part-time and full-time employees. With the enforcement date now here, affected employers should be reviewing their current policies and handbooks to ensure compliance with the new ordinances taking effect.
Questions about whether your company is in compliance? Contact Mark T. Berhow in our Minneapolis office, or your regular Hinshaw attorney.
Featured Insights

In The News
Aug 24, 2026
David Schultz Reviews a Humorous—But Important—FDCPA Procedural Ruling

Press Release
Aug 20, 2026
115 Hinshaw Lawyers Recognized in 2027 Editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and Ones to Watch®

Press Release
Aug 20, 2026
Hinshaw’s Landmark Tower Client Project Receives 2026 Top Projects Award

Press Release
Aug 19, 2026
Fernando Rivera-Maissonet Elected as HNBA Region II Governor and Board of Governors Member

Employment Law Observer
Aug 17, 2026
Massachusetts’ First Paid Family Medical Leave Act Verdict Yields $4.75 Million Award

Press Release
Aug 13, 2026
Lauren Campisi Recognized as a 2026 BTI Client Service All-Star by BTI Consulting Group

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Aug 13, 2026
How Will Banks Be Impacted by the Proposed Regulation O Amendments?

Press Release
Aug 12, 2026
William Cook Honored With the Distinguished Service Award by the Chicago Bar Association

Webinar
Aug 12, 2026
John Ryan Presents on "Understanding what is Covered Under the TCPA Today"

In The News
Aug 12, 2026
Scott Seaman Analyzes California’s New Pleading Standards for Excess Insurance Policy Claims


