Minneapolis and St. Paul Sick and Safe Time Ordinances Set to Take Effect July 1st
The sick time ordinances passed by both the Minneapolis and St. Paul City Councils take effect July 1, 2017. The Minneapolis Sick and Safe Time ordinance requires all employers with six or more employees to provide paid sick time; employers with five or less employees are required to provide unpaid sick time. The St. Paul Earned Sick and Safe Time ordinance will apply to all employers, regardless of size, but gives a six-month grace period to employers with 23 or fewer employees. Both cities have also included a deferral provision for new employers.
The ordinances require that employees accrue one hour of leave for every 30 hours worked, up to a maximum of 48 hours per year. Additionally, employees may carry over accrued but unused leave subject to an 80 hour cap. As originally written, each ordinance covered all employees, regardless of employer location, working in that city for at least 80 hours in one calendar year. That provision is currently on hold.
In January, the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and others sued in Hennepin County District Court seeking to halt the Minneapolis ordinance. The Court ruled that the ordinance can proceed as planned, but issued a temporary restraining order preventing the ordinance from impacting employers physically located outside of Minneapolis. The matter is currently on appeal, with oral arguments scheduled for July 11, 2017. The City of St. Paul will also be enforcing its ordinance only against employers physically located within St. Paul.
The ordinances also faced some uncertainty after the Minnesota legislature passed a state preemption bill. On May 30, 2017, Governor Mark Dayton ultimately vetoed the bill that would have prevented local employment law ordinances, including the Minneapolis and St. Paul sick and safe time ordinances.
Affected employers currently providing employees with sick time under an existing paid leave policy that "meets or exceeds, and does not otherwise conflict" with the ordinances are not required to provide additional sick time. However, employers should note that the ordinances are different from many employers' existing policies in that the ordinances apply to both part-time and full-time employees. With the enforcement date now here, affected employers should be reviewing their current policies and handbooks to ensure compliance with the new ordinances taking effect.
Questions about whether your company is in compliance? Contact Mark T. Berhow in our Minneapolis office, or your regular Hinshaw attorney.
Featured Insights

Press Release
Sep 18, 2026
Paris Glazer Named to Chicago Daily Law Bulletin’s 2026 40 Attorneys Under Forty

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 17, 2026
Federal and State Regulators Continue Crackdown on Junk Fees

Press Release
Sep 17, 2026
Defense Verdict Reduces $134 Million Demand to $2 Million in Catastrophic Motorcycle Injury Case

Insights for Insurers Alert
Sep 16, 2026
America 250: The Nation’s Unique Contributions to Insurance Coverage Law and Litigation

In The News
Sep 15, 2026
Lucy Wang Discusses the California Insurance Commissioner’s Role in Protecting Consumers

Press Release
Sep 10, 2026
Hinshaw Attorneys Recognized as 2027 Lexology Index Thought Leaders: USA

In The News
Sep 10, 2026
Nicholas Ajello and Gregory Emry Analyze FAA’s Proposed BVLOS Drone Regulations

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 9, 2026
“Play Now, Arbitrate Later”—“Not So Fast,” Ninth Circuit Says

In The News
Sep 9, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Discusses “Patchwork” of Laws Targeting Personalized Pricing

Employment Law Observer
Sep 8, 2026
Five Workplace Issues Every Employer Should Address Before They Become a Costly Lawsuit

Press Release
Sep 8, 2026
Jim Sandy Appointed Chair of ABA Debt Collection and Bankruptcy Subcommittee

