Implementing a Policy Review to Ensure You Are Protected Under The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, Part 1: Why You Should Conduct a Policy Review
Ambrose McCall will be presenting "The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act: Navigating the New Normal of Workplace Technology and Cybersecurity" on Thursday, October 12, 2017, at the 22nd Annual Labor & Employment Seminar. This year's Seminar will be held at the Hilton Chicago-Northbrook in Northbrook, Illinois. Please visit our website for more details.
One size rarely fits all, especially where technology is concerned. So too is employer coverage under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”). Cookie-cutter molds for aspects of your business simply do not work.
Certain situations readily qualify for coverage under the CFAA, such as when current or former employees hack into employer databases or files that were always off-limits to the employee, such as:
- Databases that contain highly protected financial data with account numbers that employees could use to misappropriate funds;
- Digital files that contain confidential business strategies that the employee accesses to alter, delete, or erase its digital files so that the employer must reconstruct the file, which usually involves significant costs to the employer; and
- Digital files with confidential proprietary client contact and marketing data that a current employee, acting as a conduit to a former employee who now lacks authorized access, removes or transfers with the purpose of permanently damaging the digital files at great cost to the employer.
The employer's protections under the CFAA, however, extend beyond these more common examples. The CFAA also can protect employers that enforce existing policies against current employees who may have arguably exceeded their authorized access to the employer’s computers, networks, and digital files.
The humility that comes with experience has taught many of us that no magic policy language exists that can transform an employee's marginal violation of your authorized access policy into a clear violation which is covered by the CFAA. Therefore, employers should examine their policies and processes as a whole with an eye toward determining whether their policies and practices work cohesively to prohibit an employee's access to designated computers, networks, and digital files, and that the employer is adequately protected from employee misconduct under the CFAA. In Part 2 of this series, we will provide detailed guidance on how to conduct your policy review and questions that you should consider throughout the policy review to ensure you are protected under the CFAA.
Topics
Featured Insights

Press Release
Sep 18, 2026
Paris Glazer Named to Chicago Daily Law Bulletin’s 2026 40 Attorneys Under Forty

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 17, 2026
Federal and State Regulators Continue Crackdown on Junk Fees

Press Release
Sep 17, 2026
Defense Verdict Reduces $134 Million Demand to $2 Million in Catastrophic Motorcycle Injury Case

Insights for Insurers Alert
Sep 16, 2026
America 250: The Nation’s Unique Contributions to Insurance Coverage Law and Litigation

In The News
Sep 15, 2026
Lucy Wang Discusses the California Insurance Commissioner’s Role in Protecting Consumers

Press Release
Sep 10, 2026
Hinshaw Attorneys Recognized as 2027 Lexology Index Thought Leaders: USA

In The News
Sep 10, 2026
Nicholas Ajello and Gregory Emry Analyze FAA’s Proposed BVLOS Drone Regulations

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 9, 2026
“Play Now, Arbitrate Later”—“Not So Fast,” Ninth Circuit Says

In The News
Sep 9, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Discusses “Patchwork” of Laws Targeting Personalized Pricing

Employment Law Observer
Sep 8, 2026
Five Workplace Issues Every Employer Should Address Before They Become a Costly Lawsuit

Press Release
Sep 8, 2026
Jim Sandy Appointed Chair of ABA Debt Collection and Bankruptcy Subcommittee

