EEOC Lawsuit Reminds Employers to Accommodate Pregnant Workers As It Does Other Employees
Reminding employers of their obligation to accommodate pregnant employees in the same manner as non-pregnant employees, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission recently filed a sex discrimination lawsuit against a North Carolina nursing center. The complaint alleges the center violated the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (PDA) when it terminated two nursing assistants because of their pregnancy-related restrictions. In one case, the center placed the nursing assistant on unpaid leave when she asked the center to accommodate a pulling, lifting, and pushing restriction placed on her by her physician, then terminated her employment. The center terminated the second employee for similar reasons. The EEOC alleges the nursing center had the ability to accommodate such restrictions because they accommodated similar restrictions for non-pregnant employees who suffered work injuries.The EEOC is seeking declaratory and compensatory relief, as well as other monetary relief, for the terminated employees.
The PDA prohibits discrimination on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions. While the Act has no specific provision requiring employers to accommodate pregnant employees, it does state that women affected by “pregnancy, childbirth or other related medical conditions shall be treated the same for all employment-related purposes, including the receipt of benefits for fringe benefit programs, as other persons not so affected but similar in their ability or inability to work.” 42 U.S.C. 2000e(k). In other words, employers must treat pregnancy restrictions the same way it treats any other medical condition. While the Act does not require employers to affirmatively provide maternity leave or other accommodations, it does prohibit employers from treating pregnancy less favorably than other medical conditions.
Employers must be mindful in accommodating pregnancy-related requests, and should accommodate the request the same way it accommodates requests for non-pregnant employees. Employers should also be mindful of other federal laws that affect treatment of pregnant employees including the American With Disabilities Act and the Family and Medical Leave Act, as well as any applicable state law that may be even more restrictive than the provisions of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. Employment policies that do not facially discriminate may nonetheless be susceptible to a claim if they impose significant burdens on pregnant employees without a strong justification. The key is not preferential treatment but equal treatment.
Featured Insights

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
May 14, 2026
Key Takeaways from the 2026 MBA Legal Issues and Regulatory Compliance Conference

In The News
May 13, 2026
Hinshaw Contributes Chapters to “Wrongful-Death and Survival Actions” IICLE Handbook

In The News
May 12, 2026
Hinshaw GC Steve Puiszis Discusses Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in an AI Age

Event
May 12-13, 2026
Mitchel Chargo Speaks on the Rapidly Evolving Cannabis Industry

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
May 11, 2026
Tennessee Reaches Settlement with Mariner in Multistate UDAAP Enforcement Action

Press Release
May 11, 2026
Ali Degan Elected to the Fellows of the American Bar Foundation

Press Release
May 11, 2026
John Weedon Re-Elected to the Jacksonville Bar Association’s Board of Governors in 2026

Press Release
May 7, 2026
Hinshaw Recognized as a 2026 BTI Associate Satisfaction A-Lister Firm

Press Release
May 7, 2026
Pedro Hernandez Recognized at the 2026 ALM Florida Legal Awards Gala



