Department of Labor: Married Same-Sex Couples have FMLA Rights Regardless of State of Residence
The U.S. Department of Labor ("DOL") recently announced its Final Rule changing the definition of "spouse" in the Family and Medical Leave Act ("FMLA") to include most same-sex married couples. The Final Rule becomes effective March 27, 2015.
The changes stem from last year’s Supreme Court decision in United States v. Windsor. In Windsor, the Supreme Court decision struck Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (defining "marriage" for purposes of federal law as being between one man and one woman). Immediately on the heels of the Windsor decision, the DOL clarified the decisions’ effect on the FMLA’s then-current definition of “spouse”: same-sex couples were “spouses” under the FMLA, but only if they resided in a state that recognized same-sex marriage.
On February 23, 2015, however, the DOL announced that it was going one step further by issuing a Final Rule providing for uniform treatment of same-sex spouses based on their place of celebration instead of the state of residence. In other words, if a same-sex couple was validly married in a state that recognizes same-sex marriage, then they are "spouses" for FMLA purposes regardless of where they live in the future. (Same-sex couples who were married outside the United States will be considered FMLA "spouses" as long as the marriage was valid in the country of celebration and would be considered valid in at least one U.S. state.)
As a result, after the effective date of March 27, 2015, most same-sex married couples will achieve "spousal" status under the FLMA, which will allow employees to take leave for their same-sex partners’ serious health conditions, for spousal military "qualifying exigency" leave, or for spousal military caregiver leave. It also means that employees will be able to take leave for the serious health condition of the children of their same-sex partners, even if the employee is not acting in loco parentis with respect to the child.
This is a simple but significant change in the law, of which all employers should be aware. If you have any questions about the DOL’s new Rule and/or compliance, contact Andrew Gordon of Hinshaw’s Fort Lauderdale office.
Topics
Featured Insights

Press Release
Sep 18, 2026
Paris Glazer Named to Chicago Daily Law Bulletin’s 2026 40 Attorneys Under Forty

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 17, 2026
Federal and State Regulators Continue Crackdown on Junk Fees

Press Release
Sep 17, 2026
Defense Verdict Reduces $134 Million Demand to $2 Million in Catastrophic Motorcycle Injury Case

Insights for Insurers Alert
Sep 16, 2026
America 250: The Nation’s Unique Contributions to Insurance Coverage Law and Litigation

In The News
Sep 15, 2026
Lucy Wang Discusses the California Insurance Commissioner’s Role in Protecting Consumers

Press Release
Sep 10, 2026
Hinshaw Attorneys Recognized as 2027 Lexology Index Thought Leaders: USA

In The News
Sep 10, 2026
Nicholas Ajello and Gregory Emry Analyze FAA’s Proposed BVLOS Drone Regulations

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 9, 2026
“Play Now, Arbitrate Later”—“Not So Fast,” Ninth Circuit Says

In The News
Sep 9, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Discusses “Patchwork” of Laws Targeting Personalized Pricing

Employment Law Observer
Sep 8, 2026
Five Workplace Issues Every Employer Should Address Before They Become a Costly Lawsuit

Press Release
Sep 8, 2026
Jim Sandy Appointed Chair of ABA Debt Collection and Bankruptcy Subcommittee

