Department of Labor: Married Same-Sex Couples have FMLA Rights Regardless of State of Residence
The U.S. Department of Labor ("DOL") recently announced its Final Rule changing the definition of "spouse" in the Family and Medical Leave Act ("FMLA") to include most same-sex married couples. The Final Rule becomes effective March 27, 2015.
The changes stem from last year’s Supreme Court decision in United States v. Windsor. In Windsor, the Supreme Court decision struck Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (defining "marriage" for purposes of federal law as being between one man and one woman). Immediately on the heels of the Windsor decision, the DOL clarified the decisions’ effect on the FMLA’s then-current definition of “spouse”: same-sex couples were “spouses” under the FMLA, but only if they resided in a state that recognized same-sex marriage.
On February 23, 2015, however, the DOL announced that it was going one step further by issuing a Final Rule providing for uniform treatment of same-sex spouses based on their place of celebration instead of the state of residence. In other words, if a same-sex couple was validly married in a state that recognizes same-sex marriage, then they are "spouses" for FMLA purposes regardless of where they live in the future. (Same-sex couples who were married outside the United States will be considered FMLA "spouses" as long as the marriage was valid in the country of celebration and would be considered valid in at least one U.S. state.)
As a result, after the effective date of March 27, 2015, most same-sex married couples will achieve "spousal" status under the FLMA, which will allow employees to take leave for their same-sex partners’ serious health conditions, for spousal military "qualifying exigency" leave, or for spousal military caregiver leave. It also means that employees will be able to take leave for the serious health condition of the children of their same-sex partners, even if the employee is not acting in loco parentis with respect to the child.
This is a simple but significant change in the law, of which all employers should be aware. If you have any questions about the DOL’s new Rule and/or compliance, contact Andrew Gordon of Hinshaw’s Fort Lauderdale office.
Topics
Featured Insights

Employment Law Observer
Aug 10, 2026
As Leaves Fall, Leave Requests Rise: Are You Compliant With Chicago’s Expanded Rules?

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

