Christian Employee Lacks Religious Accommodation Claim
1 min read
Nov 28, 2012
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently addressed the issue of accommodations of employees' religious practices.
In Porter v. Chicago, Case No. 11-2006 (7th Cir. Nov. 8, 2012), a Christian data entry clerk at the police department had Fridays and Saturdays off. Due to her religion, the employee requested to have Sundays and Mondays off instead. The employer refused the employee’s request but did offer her the option of working a later shift on Sundays so that she could attend church services. The employee brought suit against the employer alleging that it failed to reasonably accommodate her religious beliefs in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit rejected the employee’s claim. The Court held that employers do not have a duty to accommodate an employee’s religion “at all costs.” Instead, employers must provide a reasonable accommodation that “eliminates the conflict between employment requirements and religious practices.” Accordingly, the Court found that the employer satisfied its duty to provide a reasonable accommodation by offering a later Sunday shift to the employee.
This case demonstrates that though employers do not need to provide employees with each and every accommodation they request, employers must still provide a reasonable accommodation to employees who require such an accommodation to practice their religion.
Topics
Featured Insights

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology
