CA Court Finds Arbitration Agreement with Modification Provisions to be Illusory
1 min read
Apr 23, 2012
The California Court of Appeals recently found an employer's arbitration agreement to be "illusory" because it contained a modification provision which stated that the employer had the right to amend, modify, or revoke the arbitration contract on 30 days' written notice, and at the end of the 30-day period, a contract change applies to any claim that has not been filed with the American Arbitration Association.
Specifically, the Court held that an arbitration contract which contains a modification provision is illusory if an amendment, midfication, or revocation applies to claims that have accrued or are known to the employer. However, if a modification provision contains restrictions so that it exempts all claims, accrued or known, from a contract change, the Court held that this would not be deemed illusory.
The Court noted that the reason it was illusory was because an employer could amend the contract in anticipation of a specific claim, altering the arbitration process to the employee's detriment and making it more likely the employer would prevail in the end. Further, the Court reasoned that it was illusory because the employer could terminate the arbitration agreement altogether, if the Company deemed that to be more beneficial.
Arbitration agreements often come under careful scrutiny here in California, particularly in the wake of cases like AT&T v. Concepcion and Mayers v. Volt Management.
Topics
Featured Insights

Employment Law Observer
Aug 10, 2026
As Leaves Fall, Leave Requests Rise: Are You Compliant With Chicago’s Expanded Rules?

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

