FTC Finalizes Significantly Narrowed Junk Fees Rule – Initial Takeaways Applicable to the Auto Industry
On December 17, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued its final trade regulation rule, "Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees," commonly referred to as the "Junk Fees Rule." We review the significance of the Final Rule as it applies to the auto industry.
Final Junk Fees Rule Limited to Live-Event Tickets and Short-Term Lodging
The Final Rule – which the FTC has emphasized is bipartisan in nature – has been significantly narrowed from its October 2023 Proposed Rule. As finalized, the Junk Fees Rule applies only to the offering of a "Covered Good or Service," defined as:
- Live-event tickets; or
- Short-term lodging, including temporary sleeping accommodations at a hotel, motel, inn, short-term rental, vacation rental, or other place of lodging.
Junk Fees Rule Impact on the Auto Industry and CARS Rule
Conversely, the Proposed Rule would have applied broadly to any "Business." While the Proposed Rule included a carve-out for motor vehicle dealers subject to the FTC's Combatting Auto Retail Scams (CARS) Rule, the Final Rule removed the carve-out for motor vehicle dealers required to comply with the CARS Rule because of the Final Rule's narrowed scope.
The viability of the CARS Rule is currently in the hands of the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which heard oral arguments on the trade groups' litigation in October. If the CARS Rule were to be struck down by the Fifth Circuit, the auto industry has been preparing for the potential applicability of the Junk Fees Rule in its place.
However, due to the significantly narrowed Final Junk Fees Rule, an invalidated CARS Rule would lessen the regulatory burdens on both motor vehicle dealers and the auto industry, including auto finance companies.
Certainly, the FTC could continue to take action under its Section 5 UDAP authority, but the lack of a Final Rule likely precludes the FTC from seeking equitable monetary relief in federal court based on the 2021 U.S. Supreme Court decision in AMG Capital Management. The CFPB will continue to supervise and enforce compliance based on its UDAAP authority, but its priorities under the new presidential administration remain unknown.
Commissioner Ferguson Dissents, Somewhat
The FTC approved the publication of the Final Rule with a 4-1 vote, with President-elect Trump's pick for FTC Chair, Commissioner Andrew Ferguson, dissenting. Of note, Commissioner Ferguson did not dissent on the merits of the Final Rule but "only on the ground that the time for rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC is over."
Hinshaw's financial services regulatory and compliance team and auto finance industry group will continue to monitor developments related to junk fees at the federal and state levels. Please feel free to contact Dustin Alonzo or Lauren Campisi with any questions.
Topics
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Webinar
Apr 29, 2026
When a Cyber Breach Hits: Cybersecurity, Privacy, and Compliance

In The News
Apr 28, 2026
Matt Henderson Provides Media Insights as Conflict of Interest Lawsuits Target Law Firms

In The News
Apr 28, 2026
Akeela White Analyzes US House Hearing on Credit Reporting Compliance Reforms

In The News
Apr 24, 2026
Michael Dowell Reviews New PBM Reform Reshaping Pharmacy Reimbursement

Lawyers for the Profession® Alert
Apr 21, 2026
When Does a Client’s Duty to Investigate Begin? Lessons from a Time-Barred Malpractice Case

Press Release
Apr 20, 2026
Tom Kuzmanovic Selected for BizTimes Milwaukee 2026 Notable Leaders in Law

Press Release
Apr 17, 2026
André Sesler Elected to the Board of Trustees of the University of Florida Law Center Association

Hinshaw Alert
Apr 17, 2026
Q&A: How to Submit Your IEEPA Refund Claim as CAPE Portal Launches April 20, 2026

In The News
Apr 14, 2026
Bloomberg Law Recaps Panels Presented at Hinshaw's 25th Anniversary LMRM Conference



