Major Win for Passive Debt Buyer as Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Rules the Company is not an Unlicensed Debt Collector
In The News | 2 min read
Apr 16, 2018
Hinshaw client LVNV Funding LLC secured a major victory this week on behalf of passive debt buyers in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. At issue was whether the company was operating as an unlicensed debt collector in Massachusetts. The case could resonate outside of the Bay State in other areas where passive debt buyers have been sued for not obtaining licenses as debt collectors. A Hinshaw legal team consisting of Dave Schultz, John Ryan and Andrew Schneiderman represented LVNV in the case.
Passive debt buyers are investors who purchase debt and then hire debt collectors to collect the debt on their behalf. In a consolidated class action lawsuit, debtors alleged that LVNV was required to obtain a debt collector license under the Massachusetts Fair Debt Collection Act— modeled after the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act—in order to operate in Massachusetts. On motion for summary judgment, a trial judge ruled that LVNV was operating as a debt collector without a license.
In a ruling issued on April 9, 2018, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court vacated the trial judge's ruling, holding that passive debt buyers such as LVNV are not considered "debt collectors" under the licensing statute. As part of this ruling, the Court reviewed the legislative history of the MFDCPA and the FDCPA, and determined that passive debt buyers with "no employees and no contact whatsoever with debtors" were "outside the core concerns" of Congress, and by implication the Massachusetts legislature, when it adopted the statute. The Court also noted that the Massachusetts licensing regulator—the Division of Banks—has consistently concluded that a passive debt buyer is not included in the definition of "debt collector" under the MFDCPA.
"We are pleased that the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court unanimously agreed with our position that a passive debt buyer is not a debt collector under Massachusetts law," said Hinshaw partner Dave Schultz. "It is a great win for our client LVNV."
The decision received significant media coverage:
Mass. Justices Say Passive Debt Buyer Doesn't Need License, Law360 (subscription may be required)
Massachusetts Supreme Court Rules Passive Debt Buyers Don’t Need Licenses, AccountsRecovery.net
The case is Tara Dorrian et al. v. LVNV Funding LLC, case number 12355, in the Supreme Judicial Court for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Download a copy of the decision (PDF)
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
Featured Insights

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology

In The News
Jul 27, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses How the Insurance Industry Contributed to the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jul 27, 2026
Compliance Guidance for the New Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (VDPOSA)



