Major Win for Passive Debt Buyer as Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Rules the Company is not an Unlicensed Debt Collector
In The News | 2 min read
Apr 16, 2018
Hinshaw client LVNV Funding LLC secured a major victory this week on behalf of passive debt buyers in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. At issue was whether the company was operating as an unlicensed debt collector in Massachusetts. The case could resonate outside of the Bay State in other areas where passive debt buyers have been sued for not obtaining licenses as debt collectors. A Hinshaw legal team consisting of Dave Schultz, John Ryan and Andrew Schneiderman represented LVNV in the case.
Passive debt buyers are investors who purchase debt and then hire debt collectors to collect the debt on their behalf. In a consolidated class action lawsuit, debtors alleged that LVNV was required to obtain a debt collector license under the Massachusetts Fair Debt Collection Act— modeled after the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act—in order to operate in Massachusetts. On motion for summary judgment, a trial judge ruled that LVNV was operating as a debt collector without a license.
In a ruling issued on April 9, 2018, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court vacated the trial judge's ruling, holding that passive debt buyers such as LVNV are not considered "debt collectors" under the licensing statute. As part of this ruling, the Court reviewed the legislative history of the MFDCPA and the FDCPA, and determined that passive debt buyers with "no employees and no contact whatsoever with debtors" were "outside the core concerns" of Congress, and by implication the Massachusetts legislature, when it adopted the statute. The Court also noted that the Massachusetts licensing regulator—the Division of Banks—has consistently concluded that a passive debt buyer is not included in the definition of "debt collector" under the MFDCPA.
"We are pleased that the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court unanimously agreed with our position that a passive debt buyer is not a debt collector under Massachusetts law," said Hinshaw partner Dave Schultz. "It is a great win for our client LVNV."
The decision received significant media coverage:
Mass. Justices Say Passive Debt Buyer Doesn't Need License, Law360 (subscription may be required)
Massachusetts Supreme Court Rules Passive Debt Buyers Don’t Need Licenses, AccountsRecovery.net
The case is Tara Dorrian et al. v. LVNV Funding LLC, case number 12355, in the Supreme Judicial Court for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Download a copy of the decision (PDF)
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
Featured Insights

Press Release
Jul 15, 2026
Two Hinshaw Partners Recognized in Minnesota Monthly's 2026 Top Lawyers in Minnesota

Event
July 13-15, 2026
Hinshaw Proudly Sponsors 2026 Lavender Law Conference and Career Fair

Webinar
Jul 14, 2026
Scott Seaman Presents on Horizontal vs. Vertical Exhaustion of Insurance

Healthcare Alert
Jul 8, 2026
A New Era of Compliance Standards for California DSOs and MSOs After the Aspen Dental Settlement

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 7, 2026
What Insurers Need to Know About California’s FAIR Plan Assessment Recoupment Guidance

In The News
Jul 6, 2026
Francesco Palanda’s Practical Guide for Mitigating AI-Related Business Interruption Risk

Lawyers' Lawyer Newsletter
Jun 29, 2026
Beyond Malpractice: The Rising Threat of Privacy and Statutory Claims Against Lawyers

In The News
Jun 26, 2026
Brian McGrath Discusses Far-Reaching Impact of a NY Foreclosure Ruling on Mortgage Industry





