The Lawyers' Lawyer Newsletter - Recent Developments in Risk Management - May 2016 Edition
Lawyers' Lawyer Newsletter | 1 min read
May 3, 2016
Download or read the complete newsletter here: The Lawyers' Lawyer Newsletter
- Conflicts of Interest — Subject Matter Conflicts — Can IP Attorneys Simultaneously Represent Two Clients That Are Prosecuting Patents for Similar Inventions?
- Disqualification — Obtaining Privileged Materials Outside of Discovery — Consultation With Former Employee of Opposing Party
- Disqualification — Overly Broad Scope of Engagement Creates Concurrent Representation Conflicts
- Existence of Attorney-Client Relationship — Negotiations Affecting Client and Indemnifying Party
Conflicts of Interest — Subject Matter Conflicts — Can IP Attorneys Simultaneously Represent Two Clients That Are Prosecuting Patents for Similar Inventions?
Maling v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, 473 Mass. 336, 42 N.E.3d 199 (2015)
Risk Management Issue: What constitutes an adequate conflicts check where two clients may be pursuing intellectual property in similar inventions (sometimes referred to as a "subject matter conflict")?
Disqualification — Obtaining Privileged Materials Outside of Discovery — Consultation With Former Employee of Opposing Party
In re RSR Corp., No. 13-0499, 2015 WL 7792871, at *3 (Tex. Dec. 4, 2015)
Risk Management Issue: What can law firms do to manage the risk of disqualification when they seek to consult with or engage a former employee of an opposing party?
Disqualification — Overly Broad Scope of Engagement Creates Concurrent Representation Conflicts
M'Guinness v. Johnson et al., 243 Cal. App. 4th 602 (2015)
Risk Management Issue: What can counsel for a closely held corporation do to avoid disqualification in the event of shareholder disputes?
Existence of Attorney-Client Relationship — Negotiations Affecting Client and Indemnifying Party
George Makhoul, etc. v. Watt, Tieder, Hoffar & Fitzgerald, LLP, et al., 11-CV-5108 (PKC) (E.D.N.Y. 2015)
Risk Management Issue: What must law firms do to avoid establishing attorney-client relationships when communicating during the course of an engagement with persons or entities that may be allied in interest to their actual clients?
Download or read the complete newsletter here: The Lawyers' Lawyer Newsletter
This newsletter has been prepared by Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. It is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship.
Related People
Featured Insights

Hinshaw Alert
Apr 17, 2026
Q&A: How to Submit Your IEEPA Refund Claim as CAPE Portal Launches April 20, 2026

Webinar
Apr 29, 2026
When a Cyber Breach Hits: Cybersecurity, Privacy, and Compliance

Event
Apr 23, 2026
Driving Ahead: Insights from Industry Leaders Auto Finance Seminar

Press Release
Apr 17, 2026
André Sesler Elected to the Board of Trustees of the University of Florida Law Center Association

In The News
Apr 14, 2026
Bloomberg Law Recaps Panels Presented at Hinshaw's 25th Anniversary LMRM Conference

In The News
Apr 14, 2026
Michael Dowell Discusses the Uncertain Impact of Growing Medicare Advantage Scrutiny

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Apr 9, 2026
6 Key Takeaways From the IAPP 2026 Global Summit for Privacy Compliance Professionals

In The News
Apr 9, 2026
Megan Lopp Mathias Discusses Future of DEI Employment Initiatives

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Apr 8, 2026
After Arbitration, Does a District Court Have Jurisdiction to Confirm or Vacate an FAA Award?




