Lawyers May Solicit Lay Organizations to Lecture on Legal Topics, But Limits Apply
Lawyers for the Profession® Alert
Lawyers for the Profession® Alert | 1 min read
Feb 8, 2010
New York State Bar Association, Comm. on Prof’l Ethics, Op. 830 (2009)
Brief Summary
New York lawyers may contact lay organizations to inform them of the lawyer’s availability to speak on legal topics without violating state ethics rules. If, however, the communication is made expressly to encourage participants to retain the lawyer or firm, then the communication must comply with the ethics rules on advertising and solicitation.
Complete Summary
The New York State Bar Association Committee on Professional Ethics opined that a lawyer may ethically contact non-lawyer organizations to inform them that the lawyer is available to speak on legal topics. The Committee stated that the ethics rules had evolved to eliminate express barriers to lawyers’ participation as speakers on legal topics for non-lawyers. The opinion states that the ethics rules on advertising (Rule 7.1) and solicitation (Rule 7.3) nonetheless would apply if such communications had the express purpose of encouraging participants to retain the lawyer.
The Committee further noted that it lacked jurisdiction to determine whether New York Judiciary Law § 479 prohibited such communications. Section 479 is more strict than the ethical rule on solicitation in that it appears to prohibit both direct and indirect solicitation of legal business. Indeed, there is an open question, the Committee noted, as to whether the solicitation ban in Section 479 is still constitutional under Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 (1977).
Significance of Opinion
This opinion helps to define the scope of the rules of professional conduct with respect to advertising and solicitation in the context of legal seminars and programs, taking proper account of the robust modern role of lawyers in legal education for non-lawyers. In addition, the opinion properly recognizes that the constitutionality of the court’s archaic law banning all solicitation by lawyers is subject to question.
This alert has been prepared by Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. It is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship.
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

In The News
May 13, 2026
Hinshaw Contributes Chapters to “Wrongful-Death and Survival Actions” IICLE Handbook

In The News
May 12, 2026
Hinshaw GC Steve Puiszis Discusses Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in an AI Age

Event
May 12-13, 2026
Mitchel Chargo Speaks on the Rapidly Evolving Cannabis Industry

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
May 11, 2026
Tennessee Reaches Settlement with Mariner in Multistate UDAAP Enforcement Action

Press Release
May 11, 2026
Ali Degan Elected to the Fellows of the American Bar Foundation

Press Release
May 11, 2026
John Weedon Re-Elected to the Jacksonville Bar Association’s Board of Governors in 2026

Press Release
May 7, 2026
Hinshaw Recognized as a 2026 BTI Associate Satisfaction A-Lister Firm

Press Release
May 7, 2026
Pedro Hernandez Recognized at the 2026 ALM Florida Legal Awards Gala

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
May 6, 2026
Second Circuit Rules New York Interest-on-Escrow Law is Preempted by National Bank Act

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
May 6, 2026
From Protection to Readiness: What Today’s Cyber Landscape Demands of Organizations


