Proposed Federal Business Interruption Insurance Coverage Act
Insights for Insurers Alert | 2 min read
Apr 17, 2020
On April 14, 2020, United States Representative Mike Thompson (CA-05) introduced the Business Interruption Insurance Coverage Act of 2020 (H.R. 6494). Thompson stated the bill is intended "to ensure businesses who purchase interruption insurance will not get their claims denied because of major events, such as the Coronavirus pandemic, public safety power shutoffs or evacuations." Representative Thompson also said H.R. 694 is "a solution to future forced closures to help small business owners and their employees. Forced closures shouldn't mean the end of the local businesses that power our economy." Seven Democratic co-sponsors, along with one Republican co-sponsor, are identified in the bill.
Section 2 of H.R. 6694 provides that, effective upon the date of the enactment,
each insurer that offers or makes available business interruption insurance coverage shall make available, in all of its policies providing business interruption insurance, coverage for losses resulting from (A) any viral pandemic; 10 (B) any forced closure of businesses, or mandatory evacuation, by law or order of any government or governmental officer or agency, including the Federal Government and State and local governments; or (C) any power shut-off conducted for public safety purposes; and (2) shall make available business interruption insurance coverage for losses specified in paragraph (1) that does not differ materially from the terms, amounts, and other coverage limitations applicable to losses arising from events other than those specified in paragraph (1).
Under Section 3, any exclusion in a contract for business interruption insurance that is in force on the date of the enactment shall be void to the extent that it excludes losses specified in Section 2. The section purports to preempt state law by providing that any state approval of any exclusion of losses from a contract for business interruption insurance that is in force on the date this Act is enacted, shall be void to the extent that it excludes losses specified in section.
Further, the bill provides that an insurer may reinstate a preexisting provision in a contract if:
- the insurer has received a written statement from the insured that affirmatively authorizes such reinstatement; or
- if the insured fails to pay any increased premium charged by the insurer for providing such business interruption coverage after receiving notice.
H.R. 6494 raises several issues, but by its own terms, would not apply to the instant COVID-19 pandemic-related claims. We will continue to monitor developments.
Related Content
- Insurers Must Be Proactive to Comply With Federal, State, and Local COVID-19-Related Laws and Regulations to Limit Potential Governmental Overreach, March 27, 2020
- U.S. Congress Members Call for COVID-19 Business Interruption Coverage, March 20, 2020
- Future of New Jersey COVID-19 Insurance Coverage Bill is in Question, March 19, 2020
- As COVID-19 Coverage Law Suits Are Filed, New Jersey Legislature Considers Mandated COVID-19 Business Interruption Coverage, March 17, 2020
Related People
Featured Insights

Press Release
Sep 18, 2026
Paris Glazer Named to Chicago Daily Law Bulletin’s 2026 40 Attorneys Under Forty

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 17, 2026
Federal and State Regulators Continue Crackdown on Junk Fees

Press Release
Sep 17, 2026
Defense Verdict Reduces $134 Million Demand to $2 Million in Catastrophic Motorcycle Injury Case

Insights for Insurers Alert
Sep 16, 2026
America 250: The Nation’s Unique Contributions to Insurance Coverage Law and Litigation

In The News
Sep 15, 2026
Lucy Wang Discusses the California Insurance Commissioner’s Role in Protecting Consumers

Press Release
Sep 10, 2026
Hinshaw Attorneys Recognized as 2027 Lexology Index Thought Leaders: USA

In The News
Sep 10, 2026
Nicholas Ajello and Gregory Emry Analyze FAA’s Proposed BVLOS Drone Regulations

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 9, 2026
“Play Now, Arbitrate Later”—“Not So Fast,” Ninth Circuit Says

In The News
Sep 9, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Discusses “Patchwork” of Laws Targeting Personalized Pricing

Employment Law Observer
Sep 8, 2026
Five Workplace Issues Every Employer Should Address Before They Become a Costly Lawsuit

Press Release
Sep 8, 2026
Jim Sandy Appointed Chair of ABA Debt Collection and Bankruptcy Subcommittee


