U.S. Senate Approves Bill That Makes Mandatory Arbitration Provisions Unenforceable in Cases of Sexual Assault or Sexual Harassment
Insights for Employers Alert | 1 min read
Feb 11, 2022
Today, the U.S. Senate approved an amendment to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), rendering unenforceable any mandatory arbitration provision as applied to a dispute involving sexual assault or sexual harassment claims. The Amendment will also make unenforceable any pre-dispute joint-action waivers which prevent individuals from participating in a joint, class, or collective action in a judicial proceeding. The bill previously was passed by the U.S. House of Representatives and is awaiting signature by President Joe Biden, who is expected to sign it.
The Amendment defines a pre-dispute arbitration agreement as "any agreement to arbitrate a dispute that had not yet arisen at the time of the making of the agreement." It defines a pre-dispute joint action waiver as one which would operate to waive the right of a party to "participate in a joint, class, or collective action in a judicial, arbitral, administrative or other forum concerning a dispute that has not yet arisen at the time in the making of the agreement."
Sexual assault and sexual harassment are defined broadly by reference to other state and federal laws. For example, a sexual harassment dispute means one relating to conduct that is alleged to constitute sexual harassment under the law of any state or Title VII. A sexual assault dispute is also defined broadly in reference to state and federal law. The Amendment states that any dispute over the change in the law will be determined in accordance with federal law, and the initial determination shall be decided by a judge rather than an arbitrator.
Employers should revise any applicable arbitration policies to comply with the new law. The Amendment will apply to any dispute or claim that arises or accrues after the bill becomes law. The Amendment also will apply to any arbitration agreement and would encompass customers, for example, or even holders of equity in an entity.
Related People
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology

In The News
Jul 27, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses How the Insurance Industry Contributed to the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jul 27, 2026
Compliance Guidance for the New Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (VDPOSA)

Healthcare Alert
Jul 24, 2026
Q&A: Right to Electronic Monitoring Extended to Illinois Assisted and Shared Living Facilities

Press Release
Jul 23, 2026
Insurance Partner Christophe Burusco Joins Hinshaw in Los Angeles

In The News
Jul 16, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Anticipates Epic Battle Between “Titans of the Antitrust Bar”

Press Release
Jul 15, 2026
Two Hinshaw Partners Recognized in Minnesota Monthly's 2026 Top Lawyers in Minnesota


