Steve Puiszis Comments on the Risks of Submitting AI-Generated Case Law in Court Filings
Via the Daily Business Review
In The News | 1 min read
Mar 11, 2025
In a Daily Business Review column, Hinshaw's general counsel, Steve Puiszis, was among a select group of commentators to react to the latest instance of a law firm being sanctioned for a court filing that included hallucinated AI-generated case law.
Puiszis said that lawyers must verify AI-produced citations to avoid inaccuracies, and he stressed that traditional legal research practices remain vital. He also warned that local counsel could themselves face sanctions due to their e-signature on a court filing, highlighting that relying on others' reputations does not exempt lawyers from accountability.
Puiszis comments:
While not connected to the lawsuit, Chicago-based Hinshaw attorney Steven Puiszis thinks when the firm's policies or its training are forgotten—because lawyers are human and not robots—mistakes can occur, or as in this instance, hallucinated cases can be generated and find their way into a paper submitted to the court.
"We have seen a growing trend of district courts entering Rule 11 sanctions for pleadings or papers filed with hallucinated decisions which do not exist," Puiszis said. "The only way to mitigate this risk is for lawyers to check from independent sources any case citations and quotes produced by a generative AI tool or platform."
The Chicago-based attorney suggests lawyers should avoid doing legal research on gen AI tools or platforms that are intended for use by the general public.
"Technology, like gen AI, has not eliminated the need to cite, check, and read legal decisions," Puiszis said. "Additionally, lawyers should note that in this instance, local counsel who did not prepare or review the motion, was sanctioned because her e-signature appeared on the pleading.... Reliance on the skill and reputation of another lawyer will not avoid the imposition of Rule 11 sanctions."
Read the full article (subscription may be required).
- "Morgan & Morgan Lawyers Sanctioned Over AI Citations" was published by the Daily Business Review on February 25, 2025.
Related People
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
Featured Insights

Press Release
Sep 10, 2026
Hinshaw Attorneys Recognized as 2027 Lexology Index Thought Leaders: USA

In The News
Sep 10, 2026
Nicholas Ajello and Gregory Emry Analyze FAA’s Proposed BVLOS Drone Regulations

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 9, 2026
“Play Now, Arbitrate Later”—“Not So Fast,” Ninth Circuit Says

In The News
Sep 9, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Discusses “Patchwork” of Laws Targeting Personalized Pricing

Employment Law Observer
Sep 8, 2026
Five Workplace Issues Every Employer Should Address Before They Become a Costly Lawsuit

Press Release
Sep 8, 2026
Jim Sandy Appointed Chair of ABA Debt Collection and Bankruptcy Subcommittee

In The News
Sep 3, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Analyzes FTC Suit over Amazon’s Advertising Pricing Practices

In The News
Sep 2, 2026
Yvonne Ocrant Discusses Horse Business Legal Protection on the EquineRevShare Podcast

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 2, 2026
Two Key Wins for Mortgage Lenders on Illinois Statute of Limitations

Press Release
Sep 2, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Reappointed to CBA's Antitrust & Trade Regulation Section Executive Committee



