Steve Puiszis Comments on the Risks of Submitting AI-Generated Case Law in Court Filings
Via the Daily Business Review
In The News | 1 min read
Mar 11, 2025
In a Daily Business Review column, Hinshaw's general counsel, Steve Puiszis, was among a select group of commentators to react to the latest instance of a law firm being sanctioned for a court filing that included hallucinated AI-generated case law.
Puiszis said that lawyers must verify AI-produced citations to avoid inaccuracies, and he stressed that traditional legal research practices remain vital. He also warned that local counsel could themselves face sanctions due to their e-signature on a court filing, highlighting that relying on others' reputations does not exempt lawyers from accountability.
Puiszis comments:
While not connected to the lawsuit, Chicago-based Hinshaw attorney Steven Puiszis thinks when the firm's policies or its training are forgotten—because lawyers are human and not robots—mistakes can occur, or as in this instance, hallucinated cases can be generated and find their way into a paper submitted to the court.
"We have seen a growing trend of district courts entering Rule 11 sanctions for pleadings or papers filed with hallucinated decisions which do not exist," Puiszis said. "The only way to mitigate this risk is for lawyers to check from independent sources any case citations and quotes produced by a generative AI tool or platform."
The Chicago-based attorney suggests lawyers should avoid doing legal research on gen AI tools or platforms that are intended for use by the general public.
"Technology, like gen AI, has not eliminated the need to cite, check, and read legal decisions," Puiszis said. "Additionally, lawyers should note that in this instance, local counsel who did not prepare or review the motion, was sanctioned because her e-signature appeared on the pleading.... Reliance on the skill and reputation of another lawyer will not avoid the imposition of Rule 11 sanctions."
Read the full article (subscription may be required).
- "Morgan & Morgan Lawyers Sanctioned Over AI Citations" was published by the Daily Business Review on February 25, 2025.
Related People
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
Featured Insights

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology

In The News
Jul 27, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses How the Insurance Industry Contributed to the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jul 27, 2026
Compliance Guidance for the New Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (VDPOSA)

Healthcare Alert
Jul 24, 2026
Q&A: Right to Electronic Monitoring Extended to Illinois Assisted and Shared Living Facilities

Press Release
Jul 23, 2026
Insurance Partner Christophe Burusco Joins Hinshaw in Los Angeles

In The News
Jul 16, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Anticipates Epic Battle Between “Titans of the Antitrust Bar”


