Scott Seaman Reviews Impact of New York Pandemic Coverage Ruling in Favor of Insurers via Law360
In The News | 1 min read
Feb 27, 2024
Scott Seaman was quoted in Law360 Insurance Authority, analyzing the significance of a New York Court of Appeals' decision to deny insurance coverage to Consolidated Restaurant Operations (CRO). The court held that CRO did not provide adequate demonstration of physical damage resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a result, CRO’s insurer, Westport Insurance Corporation, was not obliged to cover approximately $50 million in business interruption losses related to the COVID-19 pandemic and government restrictions.
Seaman said the decision was not a surprise and added that policyholders are running out of time for major pandemic coverage wins.
He said that it was rare to see courts favor one side so heavily in widespread litigation as it has in lawsuits over pandemic coverage:
Policyholders may score occasional victories, but the direction of the COVID-19 business interruption coverage chapter has been set. Policyholders were simply looking for coverage for the wrong type of claims and in the wrong places.
Read the full article (subscription required).
“New York Pandemic Coverage Ruling Offers Few Surprises” was published by Law360 Insurance Authority on February 23, 2024.
Related People
Featured Insights

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jun 18, 2026
Three Key Mortgage Enforcement Developments for Lenders in Illinois

In The News
Jun 12, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Discusses Antitrust Case Against Shipping Container Manufacturers

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jun 12, 2026
Hot Topics in Data Privacy: Staying Cool and Compliant This Summer

Press Release
May 20, 2026 | Updated June 18, 2026
Hinshaw Releases America 250 Book Exploring Insurance's Role in Building the United States

Press Release
Jun 11, 2026
Nia Binns Honored With 2026 Rising Star Award by the Black Women Lawyers’ Association

Insights for Employers Alert
Jun 9, 2026
A Win for Employers: Federal District Court Finds $100,000 H-1B Visa Petition Fee is Unlawful







