New Hampshire Supreme Court Cites Michael Marick's Article on Excess Insurance
In The News | 1 min read
Jan 26, 2016
Michael M. Marick, a Chicago-based partner in the Insurance Services practice group at Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, had one of his works cited by the New Hampshire Supreme Court in Old Republic Ins. Co. v. Stratford Ins. Co., No. 2015-0123, -- A.3d --, 2016 WL 302212 (N.H. 2016).
The court held, as a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, that an excess insurance carrier's duty to defend an insured is triggered only when the primary coverage limit is exhausted, joining the majority of courts to have decided the issue. The opinion cited Mr. Marick's article on excess insurance principles stating, "The rule that we adopt today serves this purpose by effectuating the intent of primary and excess insurers that provide different levels of coverage for the same insured as part of a comprehensive risk management scheme." Read the full article below.
For over thirty-three years, Michael Marick has successfully represented property and casualty insurers in high exposure disputes over coverage at the claim stage, in trial courts, and on appeal. Mike's successes inside and outside the courtroom are based on a deep understanding of the insurance business — from the claims, underwriting and legal perspectives.
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
Featured Insights

Press Release
Oct 22, 2025
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP Launches New Website and Refreshed Brand

Press Release
Sep 26, 2025
Hinshaw Recognized as a “Leader in Litigation” in the BTI Consulting Litigation Outlook 2026 Survey

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Sep 23, 2025
Fall 2025 Regulatory Roundup: Top U.S. Privacy and AI Developments for Businesses to Track

Press Release
Sep 15, 2025
Hinshaw Achieves 2024–2025 Mansfield Rule Certification Plus Status

In The News
Sep 5, 2025
Jessica Riley Reflects in a Law360 Story on Lessons She Learned as a Junior Lawyer

Press Release
Aug 25, 2025
Trial Spotlight: Hinshaw Prevails in ERISA Fiduciary Fraud Case





