Mitchel Chargo Explores the Impact of Out-of-State Entrants in Minnesota's Craft Cannabis Industry via Benzinga
In The News | 2 min read
Aug 26, 2024
Hinshaw Minneapolis partner Mitchel Chargo recently shared his insights with Benzinga on the emerging craft cannabis industry in Minnesota. He explained that although the state legislature intended to promote a Minnesota-focused industry, the lack of a residency requirement for applicants has caused "approximately half of the pre-approval license applications coming from out-of-state social equity applicants," according to data from the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM). The OCM received over 1,800 pre-applications, with only 44 percent from Minnesota residents.
Chargo said, "The influx of non-residents increases the number of lottery participants, thereby reducing the odds of Minnesota residents winning a pre-approval in the initial lottery," adding that it also makes it more challenging for local entrepreneurs to find suitable commercial real estate after the lottery.
He pointed out social equity applicants’ challenges, such as difficulties accessing capital and finding suitable commercial real estate for use and operations in the cannabis industry. These difficulties are exacerbated by laws meant to protect these applicants, such as requiring social equity members to maintain 65 percent ownership. While these rules are well-meaning, he said they might make it more challenging to raise funds, "Investors may want more financial control and influence over decision-making than a strict 65%/35% ownership split allows."
Chargo advised those preparing for the licensing process to take a proactive approach by "investing in developing business plans, operational plans, security plans, environmental plans, employee training and education plans."
Additionally, Chargo warned out-of-state entities seeking to enter Minnesota's market to closely monitor legislation regarding “true parties in interest,” as this could limit certain partnerships and require full disclosure of ownership interests to the OCM.
He also highlighted the unique position of tribal-owned businesses in the local cannabis market. "Native-American cannabis enterprises benefit from sovereign immunity and are uniquely positioned to operate on tribally regulated land without state government oversight," he said, emphasizing the potential for these groups to bolster Minnesota's cannabis supply early on.
According to Chargo, Minnesota's unique industry, shaped by a ban on vertical integration, limits the influence of multi-state operators (MSOs) and fosters a more localized industry.
- "EXCLUSIVE: Can Minnesota Keep Its Cannabis Industry Local Amid Out-Of-State Pressure? Legal Expert Weighs In" was published by Benzinga on August 24, 2024.
Related People
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
Featured Insights

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

In The News
Jul 29, 2026
Hinshaw Authors Contribute Two Articles in Latest Edition of the CCFL Quarterly Report

Webinar
Jul 28, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie and Sabrina Janeiro Present on Legal AI Technology

In The News
Jul 27, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses How the Insurance Industry Contributed to the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Jul 27, 2026
Compliance Guidance for the New Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (VDPOSA)

Healthcare Alert
Jul 24, 2026
Q&A: Right to Electronic Monitoring Extended to Illinois Assisted and Shared Living Facilities

Press Release
Jul 23, 2026
Insurance Partner Christophe Burusco Joins Hinshaw in Los Angeles

In The News
Jul 16, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Anticipates Epic Battle Between “Titans of the Antitrust Bar”


