McGrath and Newman Consider Potential Changes to New York's Service of Process Rules in Light of COVID-19 Pandemic
In The News | 1 min read
May 15, 2020
By: Brian McGrath, Ashely Newman
Hinshaw attorneys Brian McGrath and Ashley Newman consider in a New York Law Journal article an issue of particular relevance to New Yorkers in the current COVID-19 pandemic: the state's strong policy preference for hand delivery for service of process.
The authors review New York's Civil Procedures Law and Rules §308, which provides for five methods of service of process upon a natural person. They note how the strong policy preference for hand delivery in §308 "squarely conflicts" with the public policy goals of social distancing to slow the spread of the highly infectious COVID-19 coronavirus. They compare the "more tempered" approach taken by the neighboring state of New Jersey, and suggest that expanding non-hand delivery substitute service options like registered or certified mail could strike a better public policy balance.
Read the article on the New York Law Journal website (subscription required)
"Hand Delivery Service of Process Challenges in a Socially Distant World" was published by The New York Law Journal, May 15, 2020.
Related Locations
Featured Insights

Press Release
Oct 9, 2026
Adam Topel Appointed Chair-Elect of the ABA’s TIPS Appellate Advocacy Committee

Press Release
Oct 8, 2026
Technology Service Corporation Closes on Acquisition by Blackstone-Backed Purchaser

Employment Law Observer
Oct 8, 2026
“We Didn’t Know” is No Longer an Employer Defense for Religious Accommodation Claims Under Title VII

In The News
Oct 8, 2026
Lucy Wang Analyzes What Insurers Need to Know About Two New California Laws

Lawyers' Lawyer Newsletter
Oct 8, 2026
The Rise of Management Service Organizations: How Lawyers and Lawmakers are Responding

In The News
Oct 7, 2026
Scott Seaman Discusses Google’s Coverage Battle Over Social Media Addiction Claims

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Oct 6, 2026
Mixed Messages Ongoing as Courts Disagree Whether Texts Constitute “Calls” Under the TCPA







