David Levitt Publishes Article in IP Watchdog Discussing a Recent Court Decision Involving Iconic Michael Jordan "Jumpman" Logo
In The News | 1 min read
Mar 28, 2018
Chicago-based Hinshaw partner David Levitt recently published an article titled "Iconic Michael Jordan Photograph Not Infringed – Ninth Circuit," on IP Watchdog. In the article, Levitt analyzes the Ninth Circuit's decision in Rentmeester v. Nike, Inc, an intellectual property (IP) case involving Michael Jordan—though he was not a party—and Nike's "Jumpman" logo. The plaintiff, photographer Jacobus Rentmeester, had alleged that "Nike's 'Jumpman' logo infringed the copyright of his photograph." The Ninth Circuit ultimately affirmed dismissal of Rentmeester's complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).
One of the more interesting things about the decision, according to Levitt, was the court's "explication of the classic copyright concept of the idea-expression dichotomy" and its holding that "the photograph at issue, while not infringed, was entitled to broad protection."
Read "Iconic Michael Jordan Photograph Not Infringed – Ninth Circuit," on the IP Watchdog website (subscription may be required)
Featured Insights

In The News
Jul 16, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Anticipates Epic Battle Between “Titans of the Antitrust Bar”

Press Release
Jul 15, 2026
Two Hinshaw Partners Recognized in Minnesota Monthly's 2026 Top Lawyers in Minnesota

Event
July 13-15, 2026
Hinshaw Proudly Sponsors 2026 Lavender Law Conference and Career Fair

Webinar
Jul 14, 2026
Scott Seaman Presents on Horizontal vs. Vertical Exhaustion of Insurance

Healthcare Alert
Jul 8, 2026
A New Era of Compliance Standards for California DSOs and MSOs After the Aspen Dental Settlement

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 7, 2026
What Insurers Need to Know About California’s FAIR Plan Assessment Recoupment Guidance

In The News
Jul 6, 2026
Francesco Palanda’s Practical Guide for Mitigating AI-Related Business Interruption Risk

Lawyers' Lawyer Newsletter
Jun 29, 2026
Beyond Malpractice: The Rising Threat of Privacy and Statutory Claims Against Lawyers




