Anthony Davis Author Article, "Lateral Attorney Movement: Pre-Departure and Recruitment," in New York Law Journal
In The News | 1 min read
May 7, 2012
Our last column, on March 5, 2012, left off with a discussion of the recruitment and pre-departure obligations of an attorney moving laterally to another firm. This article picks up with the recruitment and pre-departure obligations of the departing lawyer's current and new firms.
Agreements
Current Firm. Be aware of the ethics rules and case law that prohibit entering into a contract forbidding departing lawyers from competing with the firm or soliciting clients after leaving the firm.
Under RPC 5.6(a), except in connection with retirement benefits, firms are not permitted to offer or make an "agreement that restricts the right of a lawyer to practice after termination of the relationship." Clearly, firms may not enforce a contract provision that forbids departing lawyers from competing with the firm or soliciting clients after leaving the firm. Further, indirect restraints on a lawyer's right to practice, such as imposition of negative financial consequences on lawyers who leave and compete with the firm, have been held to violate this rule.
Reprinted with permission from the May 7, 2012 issue of New York Law Journal. © 2012 ALM Media Properties, LLC. Further duplication without permission is prohibited. All rights reserved.
Attachments
Featured Insights

Press Release
Oct 22, 2025
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP Launches New Website and Refreshed Brand

Press Release
Sep 26, 2025
Hinshaw Recognized as a “Leader in Litigation” in the BTI Consulting Litigation Outlook 2026 Survey

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Sep 23, 2025
Fall 2025 Regulatory Roundup: Top U.S. Privacy and AI Developments for Businesses to Track

Press Release
Sep 15, 2025
Hinshaw Achieves 2024–2025 Mansfield Rule Certification Plus Status

In The News
Sep 5, 2025
Jessica Riley Reflects in a Law360 Story on Lessons She Learned as a Junior Lawyer

Press Release
Aug 25, 2025
Trial Spotlight: Hinshaw Prevails in ERISA Fiduciary Fraud Case





