Wisconsin Supreme Court: Continued Employment is Lawful Consideration for a Non-Compete
1 min read
May 5, 2015
On April 30, 2015, the Wisconsin Supreme Court took a stand on a hot-button for employers by holding that continued at-will employment is legal consideration that will support a reasonably drafted restrictive covenant signed by a current employee. Runzheimer International, Inc. v. Friedlen, 2015 WI 45.
Friedlen had been employed by Runzheimer International, Inc. for more than 15 years when he was asked to sign a restrictive covenant. Runzheimer gave Friedlen two weeks to review the restrictive covenant and informed him that if he did not sign it his employment would be terminated. Friedlen signed the restrictive covenant and was employed by Runzheimer for another two years. His employment subsequently was terminated and Friedlen went to work for a competitor. Runzheimer sued and the circuit court determined that the agreement was unenforceable as it was not supported by consideration. The circuit court reasoned that promising not to fire an employee immediately if he signs the agreement is an illusory benefit that cannot support the "give-and-take" necessary to support a legal contract.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court disagreed. In reaching its decision, the Court explained that the duration of the continued employment was of no consequence. However, the Court warned, employers may not misrepresent their intention to continue to employ the employee. Doing so could subject the employer to claims of fraud in the inducement and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing and render the agreement unenforceable.
Topics
Featured Insights

Press Release
Sep 10, 2026
Hinshaw Attorneys Recognized as 2027 Lexology Index Thought Leaders: USA

In The News
Sep 10, 2026
Nicholas Ajello and Gregory Emry Analyze FAA’s Proposed BVLOS Drone Regulations

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 9, 2026
“Play Now, Arbitrate Later”—“Not So Fast,” Ninth Circuit Says

In The News
Sep 9, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Discusses “Patchwork” of Laws Targeting Personalized Pricing

Employment Law Observer
Sep 8, 2026
Five Workplace Issues Every Employer Should Address Before They Become a Costly Lawsuit

Press Release
Sep 8, 2026
Jim Sandy Appointed Chair of ABA Debt Collection and Bankruptcy Subcommittee

In The News
Sep 3, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Analyzes FTC Suit over Amazon’s Advertising Pricing Practices

In The News
Sep 2, 2026
Yvonne Ocrant Discusses Horse Business Legal Protection on the EquineRevShare Podcast

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Sep 2, 2026
Two Key Wins for Mortgage Lenders on Illinois Statute of Limitations

Press Release
Sep 2, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Reappointed to CBA's Antitrust & Trade Regulation Section Executive Committee


