The Dangers of Reimbursing Employees for Individual Health Insurance Premiums — and the Limited Relief for Small Employers
Prior to the passage of the Affordable Care Act ("ACA") in 2010, employers were able to reimburse their employees for the premiums those employees paid for individual health insurance. This long-standing practice was changed beginning in 2014 with the issuance of new guidance from the Internal Revenue Service and Department of Labor. Under that guidance, such "employer payment plans" are deemed to be noncompliant with the market reforms implemented under the ACA. The penalties for failure to comply with the market reforms can be severe — as much as $100 per employee, per day.
IRS Notice 2015-17, which was issued on February 18, 2015, provides small employers with transition relief from the excise taxes that the IRS would impose on employer payment plans that do not satisfy the ACA's market reforms. This relief applies for small employers that want to reimburse employees for the cost of obtaining individual health insurance policies on a pre-tax basis or after-tax basis, rather than maintaining a group health insurance plan. That relief does not apply, however, to employers that are "applicable large employers," which are generally those with fifty or more full-time equivalent employees.
The Notice provides that small employers that continued to offer an employer payment plan will not be liable for the excise tax through June 30, 2015. Starting on July 1, 2015 small employers may be liable for penalties if they do not reform their plans. The relief provided does not extend to stand-alone health reimbursement arrangements ("HRAs") that reimburse employees for medical expenses other than insurance premiums. Note, however, that because this guidance offers relief only to small employers, any large employers who still maintain these types of programs need to immediately review how they structure such programs.
While it is possible that political pressure surround the ACA may result extended or expanded relief, small employers should take advantage of the current relief window while they can to look for other means of contributing to employee healthcare costs because it is uncertain how permanent legislative solution will evolve.
Topics
Featured Insights

Press Release
Nov 13, 2026
Hinshaw Advises Client Safe Harbor Capital Partners in $44 Million Financing

In The News
Nov 12, 2026
Spencer Kook Authors Article Providing a Claims Manager’s Guide to Class Action Exposure

In The News
Nov 12, 2026
Mitch Chargo Discusses Cannabis M&A Implications in a Post-Rescheduling Landscape

Webinar
Nov 12, 2026
Michael Adams Presents on Navigating Ethics in the Digital Age

Event
Nov 12, 2026
Cathy Mulrow-Peattie Discusses AI and Supply Chain Cybersecurity

Healthcare Alert
Nov 11, 2026
Illinois Enacts 340B Contract Pharmacy Protections: 7 Steps Covered Entities Should Take

In The News
Nov 10, 2026
Brian Turetsky Examines How NYC’s Proposed POWER Act Could Expand Private UDAAP Claims

In The News
Nov 9, 2026
Kate Schnake Examines Unlawful Discrimination vs. Legitimate Advocacy in Jury Selection

Press Release
Nov 6, 2026
Hinshaw Recognized by the LCLD as a 2026 Compass Award Winner and Top Performer

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Nov 5, 2026
FDIC Proposes State Bank Preemption Parity Rule Regarding Host State Laws


