The 12 Days of California Labor & Employment Series – Day 5 "Salary History Clarifications"
It's the end of the year and while everyone is busy, employers in California should be aware of new laws and regulations that go into effect on January 1, 2019. In the spirit of the season, we are using the next "12 days of the holidays" to blog about one California law a day and that law's impact on California employers. On the fifth day of Christmas, my Labor and Employment attorney gave to me—five golden rings and AB 2282.
Last year, we updated you on AB 168, which prohibited an employer from seeking salary history information from a job applicant. AB 168 took effect as of January 1, 2018 and throughout the year it was evident that several parts of the bill needed to be clarified. As such, AB 2282 was enacted.
As noted above, AB 168 prohibited an employer from seeking salary history from a job applicant. The question was raised as to who qualifies as an "applicant." Per AB 2282, an "applicant" is an individual who seeks employment. It does not refer to a current employee who may be seeking a new position and/or promotion. AB 168 also requires an employer to provide a pay scale for the position in which the applicant applied, if a reasonable request is made. "Pay scale" is defined in AB 2282 as the salary or hourly wage range, exclusive of bonuses or equity ranges. "Reasonable request" has now been defined to mean a request after an applicant has completed an initial interview.
AB 2282 also clarified what an employer may ask an applicant in regards to salary. Although they cannot ask for salary history information, an employer may ask about salary expectation for the position. An applicant is still allowed to volunteer any information they wish to regarding their salary, compensation and/or benefit history.
California employers should already be in compliance with AB 168. As of January 1, 2019, employers should also ensure that their human resources staff and/or employees involved in the application review and interview process are aware of the clarifications in AB 2282. And, if a California employer has not reviewed their job applications to ensure compliance with both laws, they should certainly do so.
Featured Insights

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
May 14, 2026
Key Takeaways from the 2026 MBA Legal Issues and Regulatory Compliance Conference

In The News
May 13, 2026
Hinshaw Contributes Chapters to “Wrongful-Death and Survival Actions” IICLE Handbook

In The News
May 12, 2026
Hinshaw GC Steve Puiszis Discusses Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in an AI Age

Event
May 12-13, 2026
Mitchel Chargo Speaks on the Rapidly Evolving Cannabis Industry

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
May 11, 2026
Tennessee Reaches Settlement with Mariner in Multistate UDAAP Enforcement Action

Press Release
May 11, 2026
Ali Degan Elected to the Fellows of the American Bar Foundation

Press Release
May 11, 2026
John Weedon Re-Elected to the Jacksonville Bar Association’s Board of Governors in 2026

Press Release
May 7, 2026
Hinshaw Recognized as a 2026 BTI Associate Satisfaction A-Lister Firm

Press Release
May 7, 2026
Pedro Hernandez Recognized at the 2026 ALM Florida Legal Awards Gala



