The 12 Days of California Labor & Employment Series – Day 5 "Salary History Clarifications"
It's the end of the year and while everyone is busy, employers in California should be aware of new laws and regulations that go into effect on January 1, 2019. In the spirit of the season, we are using the next "12 days of the holidays" to blog about one California law a day and that law's impact on California employers. On the fifth day of Christmas, my Labor and Employment attorney gave to me—five golden rings and AB 2282.
Last year, we updated you on AB 168, which prohibited an employer from seeking salary history information from a job applicant. AB 168 took effect as of January 1, 2018 and throughout the year it was evident that several parts of the bill needed to be clarified. As such, AB 2282 was enacted.
As noted above, AB 168 prohibited an employer from seeking salary history from a job applicant. The question was raised as to who qualifies as an "applicant." Per AB 2282, an "applicant" is an individual who seeks employment. It does not refer to a current employee who may be seeking a new position and/or promotion. AB 168 also requires an employer to provide a pay scale for the position in which the applicant applied, if a reasonable request is made. "Pay scale" is defined in AB 2282 as the salary or hourly wage range, exclusive of bonuses or equity ranges. "Reasonable request" has now been defined to mean a request after an applicant has completed an initial interview.
AB 2282 also clarified what an employer may ask an applicant in regards to salary. Although they cannot ask for salary history information, an employer may ask about salary expectation for the position. An applicant is still allowed to volunteer any information they wish to regarding their salary, compensation and/or benefit history.
California employers should already be in compliance with AB 168. As of January 1, 2019, employers should also ensure that their human resources staff and/or employees involved in the application review and interview process are aware of the clarifications in AB 2282. And, if a California employer has not reviewed their job applications to ensure compliance with both laws, they should certainly do so.
Featured Insights

Press Release
Aug 13, 2026
Lauren Campisi Recognized as a 2026 BTI Client Service All-Star by BTI Consulting Group

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Aug 13, 2026
How Will Banks Be Impacted by the Proposed Regulation O Amendments?

Press Release
Aug 12, 2026
William Cook Honored With the Distinguished Service Award by the Chicago Bar Association

Webinar
Aug 12, 2026
John Ryan Presents on "Understanding what is Covered Under the TCPA Today"

In The News
Aug 12, 2026
Scott Seaman Analyzes California’s New Pleading Standards for Excess Insurance Policy Claims

Employment Law Observer
Aug 10, 2026
As Leaves Fall, Leave Requests Rise: Are You Compliant With Chicago’s Expanded Rules?

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law


