The 12 Days of California Labor & Employment Series – Day 1: No Rehire Provision is Now a No-No
It's back! Hard to believe another year is coming to a close and the holidays are fast approaching. As always, the legislature is keeping California employers busy; California has once again enacted many employment laws this year set to go into effect in 2020. In the spirit of the season, it's time for our annual "12 days of the holidays" series, where we will blog daily about one California law and its impact on California employers. So, on the first day of the holidays, my labor and employment attorney gave to me: a partridge in a pear tree and SB 749.
In essence, SB 749 bans the use of "no rehire provisions" in employee settlements. It has been commonplace to include a section in settlement agreements and general releases stating that the employee will not seek re-employment with the employer or any of its affiliates post settlement. 
An employer might think they can avoid this law if they resolve the claim without it being in litigation. Taking that into consideration, SB 749 specifically noted that this law applies to all aggrieved persons who are employees that have filed a claim either in court, before an administrative agency, in an alternative dispute resolution forum, or through the employer's internal complaint process. This means that even if an employee reports something internally and that issue is solely investigated internally without any legal action, the employer still cannot include a no rehire provision in the settlement agreement.
It is important to note that an employer can still include a no rehire provision in the settlement agreement if (1) it is unrelated to an employment dispute or (2) the employer has a legitimate non-discriminatory or non-retaliatory reason for terminating the employee's employment. An employer is best served to seek counsel to revise their settlement agreements to ensure they are compliant in 2020. It is also recommended that employers seek advice for those situations where the no rehire provision may be allowed to ensure the legalities of it prior to moving forward.
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Press Release
Aug 13, 2026
Lauren Campisi Recognized as a 2026 BTI Client Service All-Star by BTI Consulting Group

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Aug 13, 2026
How Will Banks Be Impacted by the Proposed Regulation O Amendments?

Press Release
Aug 12, 2026
William Cook Honored With the Distinguished Service Award by the Chicago Bar Association

Webinar
Aug 12, 2026
John Ryan Presents on "Understanding what is Covered Under the TCPA Today"

In The News
Aug 12, 2026
Scott Seaman Analyzes California’s New Pleading Standards for Excess Insurance Policy Claims

Employment Law Observer
Aug 10, 2026
As Leaves Fall, Leave Requests Rise: Are You Compliant With Chicago’s Expanded Rules?

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law


