On the First Day of the Holidays, My Labor and Employment Attorney Gave to Me - A Partridge in a Pear Tree and SB 826
It's back! Hard to believe another year is coming to a close. It's even harder to believe that California has once again enacted a slew of employment laws that go into effect in 2019. The Legislature certainly keeps California employers busy. In the spirit of the season, we are again using the "12 days of Christmas" song to blog about one California law a day and that law's impact on California employers. So, on the first day of Christmas, my Labor and Employment attorney gave to me—a partridge in a pear tree and SB 826.
SB 826 requires publicly held corporations with its principle office located in California to include at least one woman director on the corporation's Board of Directors by the end of 2019. It further provides that corporations with five or more directors must include at least 2 female board members, and corporations with six or more directors must include at least three female board members by the end of 2021. It certainly seems that SB 826 has roots in the #MeToo movement. As we know, 2018 was replete with news regarding harassment against women. SB 826's directive places more woman in leadership roles and has been viewed as one of the most controversial bills of 2018. One could argue corporations are being forced to add women to their boards regardless of whether they are the most qualified. However, one could also argue that SB 826 provides women an opportunity they may not have had due to harassment/discrimination issues.
There are many corporations who are already ahead of the game when it comes to women being on the Board of Directors. However, for those covered corporations, they will need to determine whether they need to add a woman to their Board in 2019 and/or whether they need to add additional women to their boards by the end of 2021. What written policies may need to be changed? What policies may need to be added? Will they increase the number of directors? Will there be term limits?
There are many issues covered corporations will need to review and analyze in order to adhere to SB 826. It is recommended they begin sooner rather than later. Failure to adhere to SB 826 will result in an initial penalty of $100,000, which rises to $300,000 for subsequent violations.
Featured Insights

Event
Apr 23, 2026
Driving Ahead: Insights from Industry Leaders Auto Finance Seminar

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Mar 13, 2026
DOJ Settlement with Car Retailer Highlights SCRA Repossession Risks

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Mar 11, 2026
Compliance Considerations for GDPR Consent in Biotech Clinical Research

Press Release
Mar 4, 2026
Marcia Mueller Named the 2026 Mentorship Award Winner by YWCA Northwestern Illinois

Press Release
Mar 3, 2026
Hinshaw Announces New Administrative Leadership Appointments

In The News
Feb 27, 2026
Hinshaw Partners Examine Implications for Nursing Homes of New Illinois Aid-in-Dying Law

In The News
Feb 24, 2026
Lucy Wang Authors Law360 “Expert Analysis” on Why Attorney Civility Means More in 2026

Press Release
Feb 13, 2026
Hinshaw Team Wins Appeal in Criminal Indictment of Waukegan City Clerk Janet Kilkelly

Press Release
Feb 10, 2026
Hinshaw Trial Team Secures $0 Defense Verdict in $15 Million Auto Accident Trial

Press Release
Feb 5, 2026
Hinshaw Legal Team Secures Directed Verdict in Florida Equine Fraud Case

Press Release
Feb 4, 2026
Hinshaw Celebrates 17 Consecutive Years of Being Named an Equality 100 Award Winner
![[Video] New Regulatory Priorities Under Mayor Mamdani’s NYC Department of Consumer and Worker Protection](/a/web/oHiTWa7kRy3Ht1brq6k4BT/bkMx39/new-york-city-skyline.jpg)
