Ninth Circuit Holds that DOL may Expand Regulation of Employers’ Tip Pooling Practices
1 min read
Mar 3, 2016
The restaurant and gaming industry lost a battle in the Ninth Circuit over whether employers that pay their workers at least the minimum wage are subject to Department of Labor regulations restricting tip pooling arrangements.
In a split decision, the Ninth Circuit concluded in Oregon Restaurant and Lodging Association v. Perez, that the Department of Labor acted within its authority to issue a 2011 regulation prohibiting employers from establishing a tip pool shared by regularly tipped workers, such as waitresses, and non-tipped workers, such as kitchen staff. The prohibition now applies to employers who pay minimum wage to non-tipped workers and thus do not take a “tip credit,” i.e., use workers’ tips as a credit to fulfill minimum wage requirements. Previously, under Cumbie v. Woody Woo, Inc., the DOL could only regulate tip pooling arrangements of employers that took a tip credit.
Under this new decision, all employers — regardless of whether they take a tip credit — are prohibited from establishing tip pools comprising of non-tipped and regularly tipped workers. In other words, employers can only use a tip pool comprised exclusively of employees who “customarily and regularly receive tips.”
Featured Insights

Employment Law Observer
Aug 10, 2026
As Leaves Fall, Leave Requests Rise: Are You Compliant With Chicago’s Expanded Rules?

Press Release
Aug 7, 2026
Daniel McGrath Re-Elected Senior Director of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insights for Insurers Alert
Aug 7, 2026
California Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standards for Excess Policy Claims

Press Release
Aug 6, 2026
Charles Townsend Named a Best Mentor Finalist in the 2026 ALM Texas Legal Awards

Webinar
Aug 5, 2026
April Toy Moderates HNBA Webinar on AI in the Practice of Law

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Aug 5, 2026
2026 AI Compliance: Upcoming Laws Every Organization Needs to Know

Press Release
July 21, 2026 | Updated on August 4, 2026
Three Hinshaw Attorneys Named to the 2026 National Black Lawyers’ Top 40 Under 40 List

Healthcare Alert
Aug 3, 2026
Fixing the Emergency Refill Trap: What California’s AB 1587 Means for Pharmacies

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Jul 30, 2026
Should Text Messages be Considered “Calls” Under the TCPA? The Seventh Circuit Says No

Healthcare Alert
Jul 30, 2026
California Courts Sharply Curtail the MICRA Damages Cap in Nursing Home Litigation

Insights for Insurers Alert
Jul 30, 2026
Analyzing a Couple of Cases Involving Exclusions in D&O Policies

