NFL Running Back Union Blocked in Attempt to Form Separate Bargaining Unit
A unit clarification petition filed by the fledgling International Brotherhood of Professional Running Backs (IBPRB) was dismissed on September 17, 2019, by the Acting Regional Director of Region 13 of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The IBPRB wanted to carve out running backs from the collective bargaining agreement between the National Football League Players Association (NFLPA)—the union that represents all NFL players—so that they could negotiate their own labor contract with the NFL. The IBPRB cited several reasons for their petition, including "unique career structures," along with a claim that the mini-max rookie wage contract is economically harmful to running backs, but "advantageous" to quarterbacks.
The petition by the IBPRB was styled as a "Unit Clarification Petition" permitted under certain circumstances by the NLRB. The petition demonstrates issues which have arisen when parts of existing bargaining units allegedly have become more specialized and discrete. The standards for whether a bargaining unit determination should be clarified and modified was set forth in Union Electric Co., 217 NLRB 666 (1975). As part of these standards, the NLRB looks to determine whether the existing unit has undergone recent and substantial changes in the duties and responsibilities of the employees, or whether new employee classifications fit within an existing or disputed unit definition. In this particular case, the Board noted that the unit clarification process is not appropriate for carving out a portion of a bargaining unit that long had been part of the relationship between the NFL and the NFLPA.
The Acting Regional Director concluded that (1) running backs are not a newly established classification, and (2) that their duties and responsibilities have not undergone any recent, substantial changes. The IBPRB, however, is apparently not ready to take a knee and has indicated it will look for a different route to certification. They have an opportunity to request review of the Acting Regional Director’s decision with the NLRB. That request is due on October 1, 2019.
Topics
Related Capabilities
Featured Insights

Event
Apr 23, 2026
Driving Ahead: Insights from Industry Leaders Auto Finance Seminar

Healthcare Alert
Mar 26, 2026
Are You Beyond the Red Line? Mastering Your FQHC’s Scope of Project to Avoid Noncompliance

Webinar
Mar 24, 2026
David Alfini on How Regulatory Citations Become Senior Living Risk

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Mar 18, 2026
How Should Entities Prepare for California’s New DFAL Licensing Requirement?

Webinar
Mar 17, 2026
Legal Insights on Medical Aid in Dying from Katie Anderson and Adam Guetzow

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Mar 13, 2026
DOJ Settlement with Car Retailer Highlights SCRA Repossession Risks

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Mar 11, 2026
Compliance Considerations for GDPR Consent in Biotech Clinical Research




![[VIDEO] Lucy Wang Featured in Business Interview TV Series](/a/web/28aUdvEJH2Txwy8MGsu35J/bo3TFX/featured-in-the-business-insurance-business-interview-series-insights.jpg)
