New California Law Imposes Liability on Companies Where Labor Contractors fail to pay Wages or Provide Workers’ Compensation Insurance
1 min read
Sep 29, 2014
On Sunday, September 28, 2014, California Governor Jerry Brown signed into law AB 1897 (D-Hernandez), which imposes liability on companies who use subcontracted temporary labor if the temp company fails to pay wages or provide valid workers’ compensation coverage. The bill applies where a temp company supplies workers to a client employer to perform labor within the client employer’s usual course of business.
Thus, for example, if the temp agency fails to pay wages to the subcontracted employee, the client company will share liability with the temp company.
The law will have repercussions in the burgeoning temp industry because one of the selling points for such companies has always been that they provide workers to clients while taking upon themselves all of the headaches of employee management — including absorbing liability under applicable employment laws. Now, when a temp agency fails to pay wages or provide workers compensation insurance, the client company will be on the hook. As a result, companies that normally use labor contractors to avoid the hassles of dealing with employees will of necessity need to concern themselves with whether the contractors are complying with the law as regards those temp workers.
Since this new law could potentially harm the market for subcontracted labor, it is important to note following language in the statute:
"This section does not prohibit a client employer from establishing, exercising, or enforcing by contract any otherwise lawful remedies against a labor contractor for liability created by acts of a labor contractor.”
In other words, the law appears to contemplate the possibility of temp companies contracting to indemnify or otherwise hold the client employer harmless where the labor contractor’s failure results in liability for the client employer. For larger staffing companies especially — i.e., those with cash reserves and adequate insurance — such a guarantee could go a long way toward removing some of the sting from the new law by alleviating client anxieties.
Please contact the author if you have any questions regarding this new California statute.
Topics
Featured Insights

Event
Apr 23, 2026
Driving Ahead: Insights from Industry Leaders Auto Finance Seminar

Healthcare Alert
Mar 26, 2026
Are You Beyond the Red Line? Mastering Your FQHC’s Scope of Project to Avoid Noncompliance

Webinar
Mar 24, 2026
David Alfini on How Regulatory Citations Become Senior Living Risk

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Mar 18, 2026
How Should Entities Prepare for California’s New DFAL Licensing Requirement?

Webinar
Mar 17, 2026
Legal Insights on Medical Aid in Dying from Katie Anderson and Adam Guetzow

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Mar 13, 2026
DOJ Settlement with Car Retailer Highlights SCRA Repossession Risks

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Mar 11, 2026
Compliance Considerations for GDPR Consent in Biotech Clinical Research




![[VIDEO] Lucy Wang Featured in Business Interview TV Series](/a/web/28aUdvEJH2Txwy8MGsu35J/bo3TFX/featured-in-the-business-insurance-business-interview-series-insights.jpg)
