New California Law Imposes Liability on Companies Where Labor Contractors fail to pay Wages or Provide Workers’ Compensation Insurance
1 min read
Sep 29, 2014
On Sunday, September 28, 2014, California Governor Jerry Brown signed into law AB 1897 (D-Hernandez), which imposes liability on companies who use subcontracted temporary labor if the temp company fails to pay wages or provide valid workers’ compensation coverage. The bill applies where a temp company supplies workers to a client employer to perform labor within the client employer’s usual course of business.
Thus, for example, if the temp agency fails to pay wages to the subcontracted employee, the client company will share liability with the temp company.
The law will have repercussions in the burgeoning temp industry because one of the selling points for such companies has always been that they provide workers to clients while taking upon themselves all of the headaches of employee management — including absorbing liability under applicable employment laws. Now, when a temp agency fails to pay wages or provide workers compensation insurance, the client company will be on the hook. As a result, companies that normally use labor contractors to avoid the hassles of dealing with employees will of necessity need to concern themselves with whether the contractors are complying with the law as regards those temp workers.
Since this new law could potentially harm the market for subcontracted labor, it is important to note following language in the statute:
"This section does not prohibit a client employer from establishing, exercising, or enforcing by contract any otherwise lawful remedies against a labor contractor for liability created by acts of a labor contractor.”
In other words, the law appears to contemplate the possibility of temp companies contracting to indemnify or otherwise hold the client employer harmless where the labor contractor’s failure results in liability for the client employer. For larger staffing companies especially — i.e., those with cash reserves and adequate insurance — such a guarantee could go a long way toward removing some of the sting from the new law by alleviating client anxieties.
Please contact the author if you have any questions regarding this new California statute.
Topics
Featured Insights

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Oct 16, 2026
Key Takeaways from the 2026 ACVL Conference for the Auto Finance Industry

Press Release
Oct 16, 2026
Nia Binns Re-Appointed Health and Wellness Committee Co-Chair of the BWLA

In The News
Oct 16, 2026
Jennifer Driscoll Explains How Bond Request Spurred AG Settlement in Paramount Merger

Consumer Crossroads: Where Financial Services and Litigation Intersect
Oct 15, 2026
OCC Releases Debanking Report on Largest Banks; CFPB Announces Follow-On Initiative

In The News
Oct 14, 2026
Hinshaw Attorneys Contribute Rhode Island Chapter in ABA Legal Malpractice Survey

Privacy, Cyber & AI Decoded Alert
Oct 13, 2026
California’s SB 690 Removes Some CIPA Claims, But Privacy and Legal Risks Remain

Press Release
Oct 12, 2026
Two Hinshaw Partners Reappointed to the NYC Bar Association’s Consumer Affairs Committee





